From the Editor

Balancing clinical and supportive care at every step of the disease continuum


 

It seems it was just yesterday that we did our first “mutation analysis” to help guide us in our treatment of patients with a drug that was more likely to work than not. Of course, I am referring to estrogen-receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) blocking therapy, and “yesterday” actually goes all the way back to the 1970s! When tamoxifen was first given to unselected metastatic breast cancer patients, the response rate was low, but when the study population was “enriched” with breast cancer patients who were ER/ PR-positive, the response rates improved and the outcomes were more favorable. So began the era of tumor markers and enriching patient populations, and the process now referred to as mutation analysis, which is becoming more broadly applicable to other tumors as well.

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

Recommended Reading

Lung cancer bypasses breast cancer as leading cause of cancer death for women in developed countries
Breast Cancer ICYMI
Cancer mortality lowest in western United States
Breast Cancer ICYMI
More cancer patients surviving longer, but age-based disparities remain
Breast Cancer ICYMI
Medicare advisers: Cancer prognostic tests not ready for prime time
Breast Cancer ICYMI
Sleep disorders in patients with cancer
Breast Cancer ICYMI
ASCO: Precision medicine initiatives take wing
Breast Cancer ICYMI
ASCO 2015: from data and learning, to daily practice
Breast Cancer ICYMI
Harnessing new data on immunotherapies
Breast Cancer ICYMI
Genomic oncology: moving beyond the tip of the iceberg
Breast Cancer ICYMI
Pan-AKT inhibitor shrinks tumors in patients with AKT1 mutation
Breast Cancer ICYMI