News

STS: Risk Score Predicts Rehospitalization After Heart Failure

Author and Disclosure Information

View on the News

Rehospitalization risk models show marginal performance

Identifying the factors that determine whether a patient will need rehospitalization following discharge after heart surgery is a huge and unresolved problem. Risk models for the rate of hospital readmission following cardiothoracic surgery have historically performed poorly. Perhaps that’s because the models often fail to include factors with the strongest impact on readmissions. Most of the factors that appear to drive readmissions seem to be out of the direct control of hospital staffs, such as a lack of support for patients once they leave the hospital. Socioeconomic factors like this have usually not been included in risk models.

Dr. David M. Shahian

The C statistic (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) for the model reported by Dr. Kilic was 0.66, very close to the 0.648 that my colleagues and I reported in 2014 for a risk model of 30-day hospital readmission following isolated coronary artery bypass grafting that used data from more than 162,000 Medicare patients who underwent surgery during 2008-2010 (Circulation. 2014 July 29;130[5]:399-409). This means that both models accounted for roughly two-thirds of the variability in readmission rates, which makes our model as well as Dr. Kilic’s model marginal in its ability to identify patients at greatest risk. Similar limitations exist for the other reported models for assessing the readmission risk following heart surgery.

One strength of the model reported by Dr. Kilic was its inclusion of patient factors that developed following the start of the index admission, such as postoperative acute renal failure.

Dr. David M. Shahian is a professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School and associate director of the Codman Center for Clinical Effectiveness in Surgery at the Massachusetts General Hospital, both in Boston. He made these comments during the discussion of Dr. Kilic’s report. Dr. Shahian had no relevant financial disclosures.


 

AT THE STS ANNUAL MEETING

References

Patients with a score of 0 had a 6% rate of a 30-day readmission; those with a score of 22 had a 63% readmission rate. For simplicity, Dr. Kilic suggested dividing patients into three categories based on their readmission risk score: Low-risk patients with a score of 0 had a readmission risk of 6%, medium-risk patients with a score of 1-10 had a readmission risk of 12%, and high-risk patients with a score of 11 or more had a readmission risk of 31%. The researchers found a 96% correlation when comparing these predicted readmission risk rates based on the derivation-subgroup analysis with the actual readmission rates seen in the validation subgroup of their database. The targeted risk-management program planned by Dr. Conte would primarily focus on high-risk patients.

Dr. Kilic and Dr. Conte said they had no relevant financial disclosures.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Family History of Cardiovascular Disease Is Key in Psoriasis Patients
Clinician Reviews
Study Eyes Impact of Blood Pressure on Survival in TBI
Clinician Reviews
New-onset AF During Hospitalization Is More Lethal in Women
Clinician Reviews
AHA: Poor Real-world Adherence to NOACs
Clinician Reviews
Man Finds Worst Way to Get Out of Shoveling Snow
Clinician Reviews
Congo Red Dot Point-of-care Test Detects Preeclampsia
Clinician Reviews
Heightened Emphasis on Sex-specific Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Clinician Reviews
New ACC/AHA Guidelines Will Curb DAPT Duration for Some
Clinician Reviews
Childhood Metabolic Syndrome Severity Declined Relative to HDL, Triglyceride Changes
Clinician Reviews
Greater Myocardial Inflammation Found in RA Patients After Heart Attack
Clinician Reviews