CE/CME

Caregivers of Dementia Patients: Mental Health Screening & Support

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Assessment Tools
Assessment tools are commonly used to screen for known negative effects of caregiving and to monitor these effects following targeted interventions. Many caregiver assessment tools exist. According to the Family Caregiver Alliance’s Selected Caregiver Assessment Measures, recent efforts have focused on revising available tools to make them shorter and easier to use.7 Newer assessment models attempted to blend content areas (depression, burden, health behaviors, and quality of life) to establish a single screening instrument, in contrast to the stand-alone tools that measure only one domain.8

It is important to select an assessment tool that is easy to administer, reliable and valid, and in the public domain.9-17 In its 2002 consensus project, the Family Caregiver Alliance recommended that assessments be multidimensional in approach, periodically updated, and reflective of culturally competent practice.18 In addition, they believe that those doing the assessments should have relevant training on the role of caregivers and the impact of caregiving.

The Caregiver Assessment Grid was developed by the Michigan Dementia Coalition following a review of 19 scales that measure caregiver burden, stress, quality of life, memory, behavior, and perceptions of caregiving tasks (among others).19 Tools range from simple to complex, with some having Yes or No answers and others using four- or five-point Likert scales. Tools listed in the Caregiver Assessment Grid that meet the criteria for brevity and are in the public domain are discussed here.

The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) was initially a 29-item tool that was reduced first to 22 items and then further to 12 items, with a brief screening version containing only four items.10,20 Correlations between the reduced-length versions were .92 to .97 for the short version and .83 to .93 for the screening version.7 The Zarit screening version has a sensitivity of 98.5% and a specificity of 94.7%.10 The ZBI is frequently applied to assess burden, has been cited in many studies, and has been validated for use in other languages.21 This interview tool measures subjective burden, distress, perceptions of social and physical health, financial and emotional burden, and relationship with care recipient. The ZBI has been embedded in other blended assessment tools; for example, it is part of the California Caregiver Resource Centers Uniform Assessment Tool.19

The Pearlin Caregivers’ Stress Scales are based on a conceptual model of the Alzheimer’s Caregiver Stress tool, an eight-item scale developed by the Alzheimer’s Association that links “yes” answers to helpful websites.22 This 15-item instrument addresses cognitive status, problem behaviors, overload, relational deprivation, family conflict, job/caregiving conflict, and economic strain, among others.22

The American Medical Association (AMA) published an 18-item caregiver assessment tool for health care professionals in 2002, encouraging them to identify the needs of caregivers. This tool includes 16 Yes or No questions and two global scale items.19,23

The Risk Appraisal Measure (RAM) developed by Czaja et al is a 16-item assessment that takes 5 to 7 minutes to administer and identifies risk areas for caregivers. This instrument explores six domains of caregiver risk that are potentially amenable to intervention: depression, burden, self-care and health behaviors, social support, safety, and patient problem behaviors. The RAM was developed and validated using data from REACH II (Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health)11 in a study involving 642 participants (219 white; 211 black; 212 Hispanic).11 The authors reported acceptable concurrent validity and internal consistency for the entire scale for the overall sample (Cronbach alpha = .65) and across racial and ethnic groups.11 The authors acknowledge that the Cronbach alpha (a measure of internal consistency, or how closely related a set of items are as a group) is relatively low but explain that this is expected due to the six distinct domains the instrument attempts to measure. The findings from this study highlight the challenge of maintaining reliability and validity in blended screening tools.

The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) is a broadly used, well-known tool that has been used extensively with the elderly population.24 The GDS has both a long (30 questions) and short (15 questions) version. In the shorter version, five of the Yes or No questions indicate depression if answered negatively and 10 indicate depression if answered positively. The long and short forms were compared in a validation study and found to be successful in differentiating depressed from nondepressed adults (r = .84, P < .001).25

The Center for Epidemiology Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item self-report scale that takes 5 minutes to administer and measures depressive feelings and behaviors over the previous week.16 It is commonly used to assess depression in caregivers.26 Matschinger and colleagues have expressed concerns about the CES-D being administered to caregivers, many of whom are elderly, because the questions in this instrument are oppositely worded: One part asserts and the other denies the content to avoid a tendency for respondents to give positive answers to questions (known as acquiescence).27 These researchers raise the concern that opposite wording may affect the reliability of the scale and recommend against its use in elderly persons.

The Caregiver Burden Scale, adapted version from the Family Practice Notebook, is a 22-item version of the Caregiver Burden Interview.28 A 12-item version was developed by Bèdard et al, along with a four-question screening version.10

There are several easily accessible online self-assessment tools. The AMA Caregiver Self-Assessment is self-scored and offers help interpreting the scores, suggestions for next steps, and resource information.23 The Caregiver Stress Self-assessment offered by Mass.gov is a modified version of Dr. Steven Zarit’s work and is also self-scored.29 The Veterans Administration (VA) has a more complex Self-Assessment Worksheet that focuses on roles and responsibilities as well as stress; a list of “next step” actions is offered, along with information about VA resources.30 While these tools allow users to assess their well-being in privacy, they do not offer the support and interventions that face-to-face screening can include.

Following Henry’s confirmed diagnosis of AD, his NP screened him for depression using the Geriatric Depression Scale and prescribed an antidepressant. She recommended that he take donepezil in the hope of slowing the progression of memory loss in the early to middle stages of the disease. She also screened his wife for her level of caregiver stress using the Zarit Burden Interview, shortened version, and referred her to a caregiver support group, informing her of respite services, including a supportive day program offered at the local Council on Aging. She also referred Henry to a memory loss support group in the community. Despite the available support, the stress in their life was palpable.

Continue for interventions >>

Pages

Recommended Reading

Older Women Have Older Hearts
Clinician Reviews
November 2015: Click for Credit
Clinician Reviews
The Challenges of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Case-Based Review
Clinician Reviews
Defying Gravity
Clinician Reviews
AHA: Older Breast Cancer Patients More Likely to Die of Heart Disease Than Malignancy
Clinician Reviews
Try to Remember …
Clinician Reviews
Diabetes Duration, Depression Linked in Elderly Men
Clinician Reviews
CV Health May Prevent Cognitive Decline
Clinician Reviews
Despite Advances, Alzheimer’s Remains a Tricky Diagnosis
Clinician Reviews
$30 million NIA Consortium Explores Links Between Vascular Health and Alzheimer Disease
Clinician Reviews

Related Articles