PURLs

Need an Add-on to Metformin? Consider This

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

CAVEATS

Did unmeasured confounders play a role?

Unmeasured confounders potentially bias all observational population cohort results. In this particular study, there may have been unmeasured but significant patient factors that providers used to choose diabetes medications. Also, the study did not evaluate diabetes control, although previous studies have shown similar glucose control between sulfonylureas and DPP-4 inhibitors when added to metformin.6

Another caveat is that the results from this study group may not be generalizable to other populations due to physiologic differences. People of Asian ancestry are at risk for T2DM at a lower BMI than people of European ancestry, which could affect the outcomes of interest.9

Furthermore, the study did not evaluate outcomes based on whether patients were taking first-, second-, or third-generation sulfonylureas. Some sulfonylureas (eg, glyburide) carry a higher risk for hypoglycemia, which could bias the results.10

Lastly, the study only provides guidance when choosing between a sulfonylurea and a DPP-4 inhibitor for secondline pharmacotherapy. The GRADE trial, due to be completed in 2023, is comparing sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists, and insulin as add-on medications to metformin; it may provide more data on which to base treatment decisions.11

CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION

DPP-4s are more expensive

Sulfonylureas and DPP-4 inhibitors are both available as generic medications, but the cost of DPP-4 inhibitors remains significantly higher.12 Higher copays and deductibles could affect patient preference. For patients without health insurance, sulfonylureas are available on the discounted drug lists of many major retailers, while DPP-4 inhibitors are not.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The PURLs Surveillance System was supported in part by Grant Number UL1RR024999 from the National Center For Research Resources, a Clinical Translational Science Award to the University of Chicago. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center For Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health.

Copyright © 2017. The Family Physicians Inquiries Network. All rights reserved.

Reprinted with permission from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network and The Journal of Family Practice. 2017;66(1):42-44.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Genes that drive glucose levels also drive heart disease
Clinician Reviews
Early menopause a risk factor for type 2 diabetes
Clinician Reviews
Examining the safety of lipid-lowering drugs in pregnancy
Clinician Reviews
New guidelines provide standardized hypoglycemia values for clinical evaluation
Clinician Reviews
Landmark psychosocial guidelines for diabetes spark debate over the ideal vs. the practical
Clinician Reviews
ADA: Empagliflozin and liraglutide reduce type 2 CV death
Clinician Reviews
VIDEO: Protein-rich diet can help manage type 2 diabetes, NAFLD
Clinician Reviews
A New Narrative for Diabetes Management
Clinician Reviews
Finding the Sweet Spot: The Diabetic Kidney
Clinician Reviews
Type 2 risk increases with number of GDM pregnancies
Clinician Reviews

Related Articles