Primary Care Medical Abstracts

Abstract: Divergent Responses to Mammography and Prostate-Specific Antigen Recommendations


 

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel .

Martinez, K.A., et al, Am J Prev Med 53(4):533, October 2017

The authors, from the Cleveland Clinic, explore the reasons for divergent responses to recent guideline recommendations against screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer. Both cancers are common (lifetime incidence of 12% and 16%, respectively), with indolent forms that are more prevalent with age. Screening with mammography and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing achieves earlier detection and relative risk reductions in cancer-specific mortality of 15% to 20%, but negligible effects on overall mortality and a risk of overtreatment that is estimated to be 30% to 80%. Benefits of screening and risks of overtreatment are unclear because of study limitations and evolution in diagnostic criteria, screening and management. Beginning in 2008, the US Preventive Services Task Force downgraded its recommendations for routine mammography (e.g., a rating of C for average-risk women aged 40-49) and for routine PSA testing (rating of D regardless of age). [EDITOR’S NOTE: USPSTF PSA screening recommendations have changed. See “ USPSTF advises against widespread prostate cancer screening. ”] While objections to the PSA rating were minimal, the public and professional backlash about mammography was profound. Reasons may include unique characteristics of breast (versus prostate) cancer, including mortality at a younger age, financial conflicts of interest (with mammography generating $8 billion per year in the US), bureaucratic incentives (e.g., quality measures, insurance reimbursement), and the influence of profit-generating advocacy groups. Many physicians do not understand the risks and harms of overtreatment or the inability of early detection to prevent metastasis, and patients want to be “better safe than sorry.” Rates of screening mammography may not decrease until truly informed decisions are possible, which will necessitate better algorithms to predict those cancers that are likely to spread. 20 references (martink12@ccf.org – no reprints)

Learn more about the Primary Care Medical Abstracts and podcasts, for which you can earn up to 9 CME credits per month.

Copyright © The Center for Medical Education

Recommended Reading

NASH rapidly overtaking hepatitis C as cause of liver cancer
Clinician Reviews
U.S. adolescent malignant melanoma nearly halved during 2000-2014
Clinician Reviews
H. pylori eradication cuts new gastric cancers by half
Clinician Reviews
Melanoma in young children may be biologically distinct from that in teens
Clinician Reviews
Hormone therapy raises diabetes risk in breast cancer survivors
Clinician Reviews
Biopsies for skin cancer detection: Dispelling the myths
Clinician Reviews
USPSTF update: New and revised recommendations
Clinician Reviews
Abstract: Risk of colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy in low-to-moderate risk individuals: impact of a 10-year colonoscopy
Clinician Reviews
Abstract: Coffee consumption and health: umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple health outcomes
Clinician Reviews
Cochrane report: HPV vaccine proves its worth in adolescent, young adult women
Clinician Reviews