Feature

Louisiana House passes 6-week abortion ban


 

Louisiana has joined a handful of other states in passing a so-called fetal heartbeat bill that would ban abortions as early as 6 weeks, about the time a heartbeat is usually detectable.

Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards

Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards

The legislation, which does not include an exception for rape or incest cases, passed by a 79-23 vote on May 29 in the Louisiana House. The bill does allow exceptions if the woman’s life is in danger, if the pregnancy poses risk of serious impairment to a woman’s body, of if the pregnancy is deemed medically futile. Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards said he plans to sign the measure when it hits his desk.

“In 2015, I ran for governor as a pro-life candidate after serving as a pro-life legislator for 8 years,” Gov. Edwards said in a May 29 statement. “As governor, I have been true to my word and my beliefs on this issue. As I prepare to sign this bill, I call on the overwhelming bipartisan majority of legislators who voted for it to join me in continuing to build a better Louisiana that cares for the least among us and provides more opportunity for everyone.”

Six other states have enacted similar abortion bans: Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, and Ohio. While most of the laws bar abortions after a heartbeat is detected, Alabama’s measure prohibits abortion at every pregnancy stage and penalizes physicians with a Class A felony for performing an abortion and a Class C felony for attempting to perform an abortion. Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey (R) signed the bill into law on May 15.

A number of lawsuits have been filed against the bans, including a May 24 legal challenge against Alabama’s law by Planned Parenthood Federation of America and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and a May 15 legal challenge against Ohio’s law by the ACLU and Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio.

The U.S. Supreme Court on May 28 upheld part of an Indiana law that requires burial or cremation of fetal remains after an abortion, but the justices declined to address the measure’s prohibition on abortions sought because of race, sex, or disability of the fetus.

Court analysts say it’s only a matter of time before the Supreme Court takes up one of the abortion ban cases, most likely the legal challenge against Alabama’s law. Abortion critics have been encouraged by the Supreme Court appointment of right-leaning Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, and hope the Alabama measure will drive the Supreme Court to reconsider its central holding in Roe v. Wade, court watchers said.

Recommended Reading

When Diet Is an Emergency
Clinician Reviews
USPSTF finds the evidence inconclusive for lead screening in young children, pregnant women
Clinician Reviews
U.S. measles cases nearing postelimination-era high
Clinician Reviews
HHS finalizes controversial conscience regulation
Clinician Reviews
Flu vaccine visits reveal missed opportunities for HPV vaccination
Clinician Reviews
Antiabortion measures may lead to Supreme Court showdown
Clinician Reviews
Weight can block psychiatric facility admission
Clinician Reviews
Vet accuracy, privacy policies of mental health apps
Clinician Reviews
Costs of oral cancer drugs rising faster than inflation
Clinician Reviews
Supreme Court upholds part of Indiana abortion law
Clinician Reviews