Medicolegal Issues

Don’t Be a Maverick; Get a Wingman

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

VERDICT

After a 4-day trial and 3 hours of deliberation, the jury found that the defendant was liable and his actions were a factual cause of injury to plaintiff, who was awarded $1.75 million in damages.

COMMENTARY

In this case, the defendant cardiologist placed an AICD (also known as an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or ICD). There was no allegation that the placement itself was negligent; rather, the claimed negligence was the decision to place it. But the plaintiff’s damages arise from the device’s malfunction—not the cardiologist’s decision to place it.

This case brings up an interesting issue of causation. As most of us know, medical malpractice plaintiffs must show (1) duty, (2) breach, (3) causation, and (4) harm. In law, there are 2 ways to think of causation: “but for” causation and “proximate” causation.

So-called “but for” causation is based on whether any causal relationship exists between an action and an outcome. For example, a drunk driver veers off the highway, through the breakdown lane, and strikes a tree, catching his car on fire. One minute later, a driver in the high-speed lane is captivated by the flaming vehicle, rubbernecks, fails to pay attention to traffic, and rear-ends the vehicle in front of him—injuring the driver of that car. Using “but for” causation, the drunk driver striking the tree “caused” the accident. If that had never happened, the second driver would never have been distracted, and if the driver wasn’t distracted, the second accident would not have occurred.

By contrast, “proximate” causation entails the immediate cause, which is foreseeable. Black’s Law defines proximate cause as “The result of a direct action and cause of loss to property that sets in motion a chain of events that is unbroken and causes damage, injury and destruction with no other interference” (emphasis added).1 Using a proximate causation analysis, the second driver’s negligent failure to pay attention to the road would be the proximate cause of the second crash.

Continue to: Generally, causation analysis...

Pages

Recommended Reading

Staying Awake to Evade Death
Clinician Reviews
Algorithm boosts MACE prediction in patients with chest pain
Clinician Reviews
Study: Cardiac biomarkers predicted CV events in CAP
Clinician Reviews
Midlife hypertension is associated with subsequent risk of dementia
Clinician Reviews
How thin should we go?
Clinician Reviews
New biomarker model outmatches conventional risk factors for predicting mortality
Clinician Reviews
Cardiovascular cost of smoking may last up to 25 years
Clinician Reviews
Diabetes effect in heart failure varies by phenotype
Clinician Reviews
Dapagliflozin meets primary endpoint in the DAPA-HF trial
Clinician Reviews
Impact of climate change on mortality underlined by global study
Clinician Reviews