Case Reports

Case Studies in Toxicology: Tiny Bubbles (Or, the Dangers of Cleaning Your Fruit)


 

References

Do all patients presenting with H2O2 ingestion require imaging to assess for the presence of portal venous air?

Figure. Abdominal computed tomography reveals extensive portal venous gas in the liver.

Reportedly, ingestion of as little as a “sip” or “mouthful” of 35% H2O2 has resulted in venous and arterial gas embolism,6 occasionally with severe consequences, but no current consensus guidelines exist regarding imaging requirements. Some toxicologists and hyperbaric physicians believe that the presence of portal venous air does not adversely impact a patient’s prognosis or necessitate treatment, and therefore a workup is unnecessary. Others, however, suggest that the presence of portal venous air indicates oversaturation of oxygen in the blood, placing the patient at increased risk for cardiac and cerebral air embolism. Neither one of these theories is well supported in the literature. Although practice patterns vary by institution, it is reasonable that all patients presenting with abdominal complaints after ingestion of H2O2 undergo CT imaging to assess for portal venous air.

If portal venous air is detected, do patients require hyperbaric oxygen therapy?

The management of patients with portal venous gas following H2O2

Hyperbaric therapy increases the amount of oxygen that can be dissolved in the blood, thereby decreasing bubble formation and allowing transport of dissolved oxygen to the lungs where it can be exhaled. Some patients with portal venous air experience significant pain and portal venous hypertension, which may respond rapidly to this therapy.10 Based on available literature, hyperbaric therapy is reasonable for patients with significant abdominal pain and portal venous air following H2O2 ingestion; less controversial is the role of hyperbaric therapy in those with cerebral air embolism. Multiple case reports of patients with significant neurologic findings demonstrate resolution of symptoms following hyperbaric therapy.6

Case conclusion

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy was recommended for the patient in this case, but transfer to a hyperbaric facility was not possible. He was instead admitted to the hospital for continuous monitoring. Over the next 12 hours, his symptoms gradually resolved, and a repeat CT scan the following day showed complete resolution of the portal venous gas. The patient was subsequently discharged without any sequelae.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Case Studies in ToxicologyNeonatal Seizure: Sepsis or Toxic Syndrome?
Clinician Reviews