CHICAGO – A novel, externally worn device for the treatment of extraesophageal reflux proved effective, safe, and well tolerated in a multicenter clinical trial.
"Given the poor response to PPI [proton-pump inhibitors] therapy in many patients with extraesophageal reflux, this device may be an alternative form of treating this difficult disorder," Dr. Michael F. Vaezi said in a presentation of the study findings at the annual Digestive Disease Week.
Extraesophageal reflux (EER) affects more than 15 million Americans. The cost of care is estimated to be in excess of $50 billion annually, most of which goes for PPIs, which are overused and generally not effective in treating this common disorder, observed Dr. Vaezi, professor of medicine at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.
Dr. Michael F. Vaezi
EER is caused by reflux of gastroduodenal contents into the laryngopharynx, resulting in a range of symptoms including chronic cough, postnasal drip, throat clearing, hoarseness, and a sensation of a lump in the throat.
The investigational device, known as the Reza-Band, is an individually fitted upper esophageal sphincter assist device to be worn at bedtime. It is designed to apply slight pressure to the cricoid cartilage area sufficient to increase the intraluminal pressure of the upper esophageal sphincter to 20 mm Hg. In earlier studies, this modest increase in pressure eliminated pharyngeal reflux without affecting normal activities such as swallowing and belching.
Dr. Vaezi reported on 47 patients with EER treated with the upper esophageal assist device at four medical centers. Their mean age was 50 years, with an average body mass index of 26.1 kg/m2. Three-quarters of patients were on PPI therapy, which they felt to be ineffective.
The primary study endpoint was the change in Reflux Symptom Index scores from baseline through week 4 of nighttime use of the assist device. The median score improved from 27 at baseline to 14 at week 2 and 12 at week 4. That translated to a mean 54% reduction. A total of 86% of subjects were deemed to have experienced treatment success as defined by at least a 25% improvement in their symptom score; 30% of participants showed a greater than 75% improvement.
Treatment side effects were few, mild, and brief, consisting chiefly of skin irritation from the device’s Velcro strap. No one withdrew from the study.
The Reza-Band device was developed by gastroenterologists at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Dr. Vaezi said he and his coinvestigators decided to formally investigate the device because "we were intrigued and impressed by the fact that it has helped so many patients."
"For me, it’s a welcome development," Dr. Vaezi added. "Just anecdotally, many patients in the study wanted to know how they could purchase this device. It’s really welcome in an area [in which] we don’t have many therapeutic options."
Still, he noted, it’s probably a good idea for device users to continue to keep a couple of bricks under the head of the bed, in accord with standard medical advice.
Future plans include a sham-controlled study designed to assess the device’s true benefit over placebo therapy; this will be an important study because EER is known to have a substantial placebo response rate, he continued. Also, plans are afoot for a safety study assessing whether the device has any clinically meaningful impact upon intraocular pressure.
The study was supported by Somna Therapeutics, which is developing the device. Dr. Vaezi reported having no financial relationship with the company.