Here’s what else is new in chlamydia:
Pregnancy: For treatment of chlamydia in pregnancy, amoxicillin at 500 mg orally t.i.d. for 7 days has been demoted from a first-line recommended therapy to alternative-regimen status. Now, the sole recommended first-line treatment in pregnancy is oral azithromycin at 1 g orally in a single dose.
“We did this based on in vitro studies showing Chlamydia trachomatis is not well-killed by amoxicillin. Instead, the drug induces persistent viable noninfectious forms which can sometimes reactivate,” Dr Workowski explained.
Delayed-release doxycycline: This FDA-approved drug, known as Doryx, administered as a 200-mg tablet once daily for 7 days, “might be an alternative” to the standard generic doxycycline regimen of 100 mg twice daily for 7 days, according to the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. In a randomized, double-blind trial, the new agent was as effective as twice-daily generic doxycycline in men and women with urogenital C. trachomatis infection, and it had fewer gastrointestinal side effects. Doryx is costlier than the twice-daily alternatives.
Lymphogranuloma venereum: The current guidelines repeat a point made in previous editions, but one Dr Workowski believes remains underappreciated and thus worthy of emphasis: Rectal exposure to C. trachomatis serovars L1, L2, and L3 in men who have sex with men or in women who have rectal sex can cause lymphogranuloma venereum, which takes the form of proctocolitis mimicking inflammatory bowel disease.
Patients suspected of having lymphogranuloma venereum should be started presumptively on the recommended regimen for this STD, which is oral doxycycline at 100 mg b.i.d. for 21 days.
“If you also see painful ulcers or, on anoscopy, mucosal ulcers, you should also treat empirically for herpes simplex until your culture results come back,” she added.
Dr Workowski reported having no financial conflicts of interest.
Catheter-directed thrombolysis trumps systemic for acute pulmonary embolism
BY MITCHEL L. ZOLER
AT CHEST 2015
Vitals Key clinical point: Catheter-directed thrombolysis was linked to reduced mortality, compared with systemic thrombolysis in patients with an acute pulmonary embolism. Major finding: In-hospital mortality in acute pulmonary embolism patients ran 10% with catheter-directed thrombolysis and 17% with systemic thrombolysis. Data source: Review of 1,521 US patients treated for acute pulmonary embolism during 2010-2012 in the National Inpatient Sample. Disclosures: Dr Saqib and Dr Muthiah had no disclosures. |
MONTREAL – Catheter-directed thrombolysis surpassed systemic thrombolysis for minimizing in-hospital mortality of patients with an acute pulmonary embolism in a review of more than 1,500 United States patients.
The review also found evidence that US pulmonary embolism (PE) patients increasingly undergo catheter-directed thrombolysis, with usage jumping by more than 50% from 2010 to 2012, although in 2012 US clinicians performed catheter-directed thrombolysis on 160 patients with an acute pulmonary embolism (PE) who were included in a national US registry of hospitalized patients, Dr Amina Saqib said at the annual meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians.
Catheter-directed thrombolysis resulted in a 9% in-hospital mortality rate and a 10% combined rate of in-hospital mortality plus intracerebral hemorrhages, rates significantly below those tallied in propensity score-matched patients who underwent systemic thrombolysis of their acute PE. The matched group with systemic thrombolysis had a 17% in-hospital mortality rate and a 17% combined mortality plus intracerebral hemorrhage rate, said Dr Saqib, a researcher at Staten Island (New York) University Hospital.
“To the best of our knowledge, this is the first, large, nationwide, observational study that compared safety and efficacy outcomes between systemic thrombolysis and catheter-directed thrombolysis in acute PE,”
Dr Saqib said.
The US data, collected during 2010-2012, also showed that, after adjustment for clinical and demographic variables, each acute PE treatment by catheter-directed thrombolysis cost an average $9,428 above the cost for systemic thrombolysis, she said.
“We need to more systematically identify the patients with an acute PE who could benefit from catheter-directed thrombolysis, especially patients with a massive PE,” commented Dr Muthiah P. Muthiah, a critical-care medicine physician at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center in Memphis. “This may be something to offer to patients who have an absolute contraindication for systemic thrombolysis, such as recent surgery, but it is not available everywhere,” Dr Muthiah said in an interview.Dr Saqib and her associates used data collected by the Federal National Inpatient Sample. Among US patients hospitalized during 2010-2012 and entered into this database, they identified 1,169 adult acute PE patients who underwent systemic thrombolysis and 352 patients who received catheter-directed thrombolysis. The patients averaged about 58 years old and just under half were men.
The propensity score-adjusted analysis also showed no statistically significant difference between the two treatment approaches for the incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage, any hemorrhages requiring a transfusion, new-onset acute renal failure, or hospital length of stay. Among the patients treated by catheter-directed thrombolysis, all the intracerebral hemorrhages occurred during 2010; during 2011 and 2012 none of the patients treated this way had an intracerebral hemorrhage, Dr Saqib noted.