Latest News

The doctor didn’t show up, but the hospital ED still charged $1,012


 

Dhaval Bhatt had been warned about hospital emergency departments.

“People always told me to avoid the ER in America unless you are really dying,” said Dr. Bhatt, an immigrant from India who got a PhD in pharmacology in the United States and is now a research scientist at Washington University, St. Louis.

But when Dr. Bhatt’s 2-year-old son burned his hand on the kitchen stove on a Wednesday morning in April, the family’s pediatrician directed them the next day to the local children’s hospital.

Dr. Bhatt was traveling. So, his wife, Mansi Bhatt, took their son to the hospital and was sent to the ED. A nurse practitioner took the toddler’s vitals and looked at the wound. She said a surgeon would inspect it more closely.

When the surgeon didn’t appear after more than an hour, Dr. Bhatt’s wife took her son home. The hospital told her to make a follow-up appointment with a doctor, which turned out to be unnecessary because the burn healed quickly.

Then the bill came.

The patient: Martand Bhatt, a toddler covered by a UnitedHealthcare insurance plan provided by the employer of his father, Dhaval Bhatt.

Medical service: An ED visit for a burn sustained when Martand touched an electric stove.

Total bill: $1,012. UnitedHealthcare’s negotiated rate was $858.92, all of which the Bhatts were responsible for because their plan had a $3,000 deductible.

Service provider: SSM Health Cardinal Glennon Children’s Hospital, one of 23 hospitals owned by SSM Health, a Catholic, nonprofit health system with more than $8 billion in annual revenue.

What gives: Many patients don’t understand that they can rack up huge bills almost as soon as they walk through the doors of an ED.

Unlike a restaurant or a mechanic who won’t charge if someone gets tired of waiting for a table or an inspection of a rattling engine, hospital emergency rooms almost invariably charge patients as soon as they check in.

And once they register, patients will be billed – often a lot – whether treatment was rendered or not.

Martand Bhatt received almost no medical service. A nurse practitioner looked over the toddler, listened to his heart and stomach, and looked in his nose, mouth and ears, according to provider notes prepared by the hospital and shared with KHN by Dr. Bhatt.

The nurse didn’t change the dressing on the wound or order any testing.

“My objection to this is that there was no care provided,” Dr. Bhatt wrote to Bill of the Month.

“My wife did not drive for 45 minutes to get to an ER and wait for an additional 1½ hours for someone to tell me that our child’s vitals – weight, height, temperature and blood pressure – were okay,” Dr. Bhatt continued. “We already knew that. ... It is absolutely ridiculous and unethical.”

When the Bhatts left the ED, Martand was “alert, active and well appearing,” according to the notes.

The nurse’s assessment of Martand cost $192, which was discounted by UnitedHealthcare to a negotiated rate of $38.92. The bulk of the Bhatts’ bill – $820 – was something called a facility fee.

Hospital officials defend these fees as necessary to keep the ED open 24 hours a day as a community asset.

SSM Health spokesperson Stephanie Zoller Mueller declined to discuss the details of Martand’s medical condition even though the Bhatts gave their permission for the hospital to do so.

In an email, Ms. Zoller Mueller said the charges were “appropriate” based on the “acuity of condition, discharge instructions, vital sign monitoring, traumatic wound care, [and] numerous assessments.”

She added: “A patient does not have to receive additional treatment – procedure, labs, x-rays, etc. – to validate an ED-level charge.”

But some patient advocates say these facility fees are applied much too widely and should be limited to patients who actually receive medical care.

“It’s just not appropriate for someone to be charged if they’re not provided treatment,” said Adam Fox, deputy director of the Colorado Consumer Health Initiative. “Patients aren’t availing themselves of a facility if they don’t get care.”

At the very least, hospitals could communicate more clearly to patients about the fees they may be charged for coming to an ED, said Maureen Hensley-Quinn, senior program director at the National Academy for State Health Policy.

“People should know that when they walk in to receive care, there is this fee that they will be assessed,” Ms. Hensley-Quinn said.

Hospitals could also post at the entrance to the ED standard fees for different levels of emergency care.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Califf plans work on opioids, accelerated approvals on return to FDA
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Medicaid implements waivers for some clinical trial coverage
MDedge Emergency Medicine
A high-risk medical device didn’t meet federal standards. The government paid millions for more
MDedge Emergency Medicine
As pandemic regs expire, states get tougher on telehealth: report
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Physicians react: Should docs lose their licenses for spreading false COVID information?
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Pandemic weighing on physicians’ happiness outside of work: survey
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Doc’s botched surgery leads to incontinence and $10 million judgment; more
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Physician burnout, depression compounded by COVID: Survey
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Seven ways doctors could get better payment from insurers
MDedge Emergency Medicine
This doc still supports NP/PA-led care ... with caveats
MDedge Emergency Medicine