Law & Medicine

Duty vs. confidentiality


 

Dr. Tan is emeritus professor of medicine and former adjunct professor of law at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu. This article is meant to be educational and does not constitute medical, ethical, or legal advice. Some of the materials have been taken from earlier columns in Internal Medicine News. For additional information, readers may contact the author at siang@hawaii.edu.

References

1. Volk v. DeMeerleer, 386 P.3d 254 (Wa. 2016).

2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California, 551 P.2d 334 (Cal. 1976).

3. Thompson v. County of Alameda, 167 Cal. Rptr. 70, 76 (1980).

4. Behav Sci Law. 2001;19(3):325-43.

5. AMA Code of Medical Ethics [2.24 (3), 2012-2013 ed].

6. AMA Code of Medical Ethics, 2017 ed. [3.2.1 Confidentiality].

Pages

Recommended Reading

Battling physician burnout delivers monetary benefits for health care organizations
MDedge Endocrinology
After newest travel restrictions, Supreme Court defers hearing on old policy
MDedge Endocrinology
Sen. Collins deals likely fatal blow to GOP’s health bill
MDedge Endocrinology
Proposed MACRA participation threshold gets mixed reviews
MDedge Endocrinology
HHS Secretary resigns amid flight criticism
MDedge Endocrinology
Ruling: Apologies can’t be used against doctors in court
MDedge Endocrinology
HCA is the country’s highest-volume health system
MDedge Endocrinology
Now missing in EHR charts: a good impression
MDedge Endocrinology
MIPS: It’s time to get started
MDedge Endocrinology
Death by meeting
MDedge Endocrinology