From the Journals

To tackle obesity, up fitness and activity or lose weight?


 

Not the first time

This is not the first time that Dr. Gaesser, and others, have published articles promoting a pivot away from weight loss as the primary goal of obesity interventions. In 2015, Dr. Gaesser and colleagues published an evidence review that gave this recommendation for managing people with obesity: “We propose that the proxy for health improvements should not be weight loss but instead improvements in cardiometabolic parameters, functional status, and fitness.”

Dr. Gaesser’s latest review also acknowledges similar recommendations from others, including Dr. Ross, who said it’s nothing new to conclude that increased fitness and activity in the absence of weight loss is not failure.

“It’s something we’ve promoted for decades,” but “it’s not understood and acted on in clinical settings, and that’s unfortunate,” he said.

More than a decade ago, Dr. Ross and his coauthor wrote in a published review that “a monolithic focus on weight loss as the only determinant of success for strategies that aim to reduce obesity is not justified and, more importantly, eliminates opportunities to focus on lifestyle behaviors that are associated with benefit across a wide range of health outcomes.”

And an effective intervention that focuses on activity and fitness means that, at the least, patients should not gain weight, and they may lose weight as a side benefit, he stressed.

“We always advocate a balanced diet, so that people do not gain more weight.”

Dr. Ross also highlighted the usefulness of measuring fitness as an alternative to recording weight to track the response by patients with obesity to various interventions. Dr. Ross recommends nonexercise prediction equations for routine practice to easily estimate cardiorespiratory fitness, an approach detailed in a 2016 statement from the American Heart Association by a writing panel chaired by Dr. Ross.

The AHA statement notes that “not including cardiorespiratory fitness measurement in routine clinical practice fails to provide an optimal approach for stratifying patients according to risk.”

The AHA also advises that “routine estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness in clinical practice is no more difficult than measuring blood pressure,” and details ways of incorporating this into routine clinical assessment.

Dr. Gaesser and Dr. Kahan have reported no relevant financial relationships. Dr. Ross has been an advisor to the Canadian Sugar Institute.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Time-restricted eating: An easy way to improve metabolic health?
MDedge Endocrinology
‘Metabolically healthy obesity’ tied to substantial heart risk
MDedge Endocrinology
Ketosis, including ketogenic diets, implicated in prurigo pigmentosa
MDedge Endocrinology
TriMaster study shows precision medicine in diabetes is possible
MDedge Endocrinology
Primary goal in T2D should be weight loss, diabetologists say
MDedge Endocrinology
Men die more often than women after bariatric surgery
MDedge Endocrinology
Pandemic adds more weight to burden of obesity in children
MDedge Endocrinology
5 years out, sleeve safer than gastric bypass
MDedge Endocrinology
Dropping weight beneficial but some effects of obesity persist
MDedge Endocrinology
Patients seeking infertility care report infrequent counseling on weight loss
MDedge Endocrinology