News

Type 2 Self-Monitoring Improves Glucose Control


 

From a Conference on the Management of Diabetes in Youth

Major Finding: Mean HbA1c fell from 8.9% to 8.0% over 12 months in controls and dropped significantly more, to 7.7%, in the structured self-monitoring of blood glucose group.

Data Source: A randomized, multicenter trial in 483 poorly controlled, non–insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients.

Disclosures: The STeP study was funded by Roche Diagnostics. Dr. Polonsky has worked as a consultant for the company.

KEYSTONE, COLO. – When it comes to self-monitoring of blood glucose, it's not the quantity that matters, it's the quality of the testing.

This was the central lesson of the Structured Testing Program (STeP) study, a 12-month, randomized, multicenter trial conducted in poorly controlled, non–insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients. STeP showed that self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) has clinical value in such patients, provided the testing is done in a structured way that facilitates timely treatment decisions by their primary care physician.

Patients assigned to the structured SMBG intervention showed a significantly greater reduction in their mean glycosylated hemoglobin at 12 months than did active controls. They also evidenced significantly more shrinkage in their mean amplitude of glycemic excursions and greater quality of life improvement as reflected in depression and diabetes-related emotional distress scores, William H. Polonsky, Ph.D., reported at the conference.

“The most interesting thing is how the study impacted physicians,” said Dr. Polonsky at the conference sponsored by the University of Colorado Denver and the Children's Diabetes Foundation at Denver. “Use of the testing form to create a blood glucose snapshot for quarterly review contributes to more aggressive treatment intensification.”

The improvements documented in the STeP study were achieved using a relatively modest but carefully considered intervention: That is, patients randomized to structured SMBG were asked to measure their blood glucose seven times a day on 3 consecutive days within 2 weeks prior to the quarterly diabetes-focused visit with their primary care physician.

Patients recorded and graphed these 21 blood glucose readings using the Roche Diagnostics Accu-Chek 360 View analysis system. They brought the form with them to the quarterly office visit.

Patients could do as much or as little testing as they wanted during the rest of each 3-month period. It was only those 21 measurements obtained on 3 consecutive days once every 3 months that served as the basis for physician/patient discussion and treatment modifications. In fact, patients in the intervention arm achieved greater improvement in HbA1c than did controls while using significantly fewer blood glucose test strips, said Dr. Polonsky, founder and CEO of the Behavioral Diabetes Institute and a psychologist at the University of California, San Diego.

The STeP study involved 483 poorly controlled patients with type 2 diabetes in 34 primary care practices. Their mean baseline HbA1c was 8.9%, with a body mass index of 35.1 kg/m

Primary care physicians in practices assigned to the intervention received 2 hours of training in how to interpret and make lifestyle and/or medication changes based on their patients' structured SMBG charts; the patients themselves got a DVD explaining their task. All STeP participants met with their physician in a diabetes-focused visit at months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12.

Mean HbA1c fell from 8.9% to 8.0% over the course of 12 months in controls and dropped significantly more, to 7.7%, in the structured SMBG group. Moreover, among the 130 patients in the intervention arm who adhered to the intervention protocol by completing at least 80% of their quarterly forms, the mean HbA1c at 12 months was 7.6%, while in nonadherent patients, the final HbA1c was the same as that of control patients. A significant drop from months 1 to 12 was seen in preprandial to postprandial glucose excursions at all meals in the structured SMBG group.

Scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire depression screening instrument (PHQ-8) dropped significantly in both study arms over the 12 months, but the reduction was significantly greater in the structured SMBG arm. Moreover, when the analysis was restricted to subjects having an elevated baseline depression score of greater than 10 on the PHQ-8, the intervention group showed a dramatic, nearly 6-point reduction over the study period, a 2.4-point greater drop in depressive mood and symptoms than that seen in controls.

Patients recorded and graphed their readings for quarterly review.

Source ©evgenyb/Fotolia.com

Recommended Reading

Sleep Apnea Tied to Retinopathy, Neuropathy
MDedge Endocrinology
CV Impairments Seen in Diabetic Teens During Exercise
MDedge Endocrinology
Liraglutide Improves Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes
MDedge Endocrinology
Recombinant Hyaluronidase Speeds Insulin Absorption
MDedge Endocrinology
Liraglutide Risks Revisited in Letter From Drug Maker
MDedge Endocrinology
Big Shift Seen in Prescribing Patterns for Type 2
MDedge Endocrinology
Exenatide Delivery Device Shows Promise
MDedge Endocrinology
Risk of Hearing Loss Doubled In Patients With Diabetes
MDedge Endocrinology
Life Expectancy Improving for People With Type 1 Diabetes
MDedge Endocrinology
Screening Using HbA1c Misclassifies Many
MDedge Endocrinology