News

S.D. voters to decide ‘any willing provider’ question; other state initiatives highlighted


 

References

Similarly, insurance companies would not be required to cover access to the investigational product.

The measure also provides protections for the physician, stating that a state regulatory authority cannot take action against a physician’s license “based solely on a physician’s recommendation to an eligible patient regarding or prescribing for or treatment with an investigational drug, biological product, or device.”

The language of the ballot measure passed the state House on March 4 and state Senate on April 15.

gtwachtman@frontlinemedcom.com

Pages

Recommended Reading

Managing Your Practice: What is your practice worth?
MDedge Endocrinology
IOM calls for pay for end-of-life planning
MDedge Endocrinology
AMA calls on vendors, feds to improve usability of EHRs
MDedge Endocrinology
Congress poised to act on 2015 meaningful use full year reporting requirement
MDedge Endocrinology
CMS website snafu could lead to penalties for meaningful users
MDedge Endocrinology
Docs step up lobbying to extend Medicaid pay bump
MDedge Endocrinology
Health experts push flu vaccination for patients and providers
MDedge Endocrinology
Watchdog finds security lacking at healthcare.gov, two state marketplaces
MDedge Endocrinology
Members of Congress urge physician pay for end-of-life counseling
MDedge Endocrinology
CMS releases data on $3.5B in industry payments to doctors, teaching hospitals
MDedge Endocrinology