News

No clear choice for vision treatment for diabetic macular edema


 

Aflibercept was more effective for vision treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema then were two other vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, bevacizumab and ranibizumab, but only in patients with poor baseline vision, according to Adam Glassman and his associates.

When baseline vision was worse than roughly 20/50, aflibercept improved vision by an average of 19%, compared to 12% with bevacizumab and 14% with ranibizumab. When the initial vision impairment was more mild, all three performed at about the same level. For patients with vision between 20/30 and 20/40, all three drugs improved vision by about 8%. For all patients, aflibercept improved vision by 13%, bevacizumab improved vision by 10%, and ranibizumab improved vision by 11%.

No significant differences in the incidence of serious adverse side effects, hospitalization, major cardiovascular events, or death were found among the three groups, the investigators reported.

Find the full study in the New England Journal of Medicine (doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414264).

Recommended Reading

FDA approves empagliflozin-linagliptin combo tablet
MDedge Endocrinology
Breast cancer patients show poor adherence to cardiovascular, diabetes medications
MDedge Endocrinology
Type 1 diabetes deadlier in women
MDedge Endocrinology
Early prediabetes treatment reduces HbA1C during pregnancy
MDedge Endocrinology
VIDEO: No consensus on diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes
MDedge Endocrinology
No increased pancreatitis risk found with incretin therapy
MDedge Endocrinology
Ranibizumab now approved for diabetic retinopathy with macular edema
MDedge Endocrinology
High-fiber diet a viable weight-loss alternative to AHA recommendations
MDedge Endocrinology
Framingham-based scores greatly overstate cardiovascular disease risk
MDedge Endocrinology
Brief, light exercise could cut cardiovascular deaths in elderly
MDedge Endocrinology