Conference Coverage

Post Radical Prostatectomy Incontinence

John P. Lavelle, MBCHB, discusses assessment considerations, total impact, and conservative and implanted treatment options for men who have incontinence as a result of radical prostatectomy.


 

References

Urinary incontinence is a troubling yet common effect of radical prostatectomy, affecting 4% to 87% of patients. The impact of urinary incontinence can reach far beyond the physical discomforts of skin irritation, physical activity restrictions, and adverse drug events: The economic impact caused by the purchasing of management supplies, diagnostic and treatment procedures, and long-term care add to the psychological concerns centered around embarrassment, guilt, and frustration.

John P. Lavelle, MBCHB, notes that too many patients adhere to “avoidance therapy,” pleased that they no longer have prostate cancer but trying their best to manage the urinary leakage on their own by wearing an absorbent pad and hiding from society. Regrettably, physicians also tend to practice avoidance therapy. “A lot of people don’t want to talk about [incontinence], but I think it’s important to bring the thing up correctly to the patient,” instructed Dr. Lavelle. “Assume that they have it, and if they tell you that they don’t, that’s great.”

Recommended Reading

Palliative Radiotherapy for the Management of Metastatic Cancer
Federal Practitioner
Prostate Cancer in Seniors, Part 1: Epidemiology, Pathology, and Screening
Federal Practitioner
Update on Advanced Prostate Cancer
Federal Practitioner
AVAHO Readies for 2015 Meeting in Washington
Federal Practitioner
Should Geographic Location Impact Cancer Treatment?
Federal Practitioner
Joao Ascensao Talks AVAHO 2015
Federal Practitioner
Systems Automation for Cancer Surveillance
Federal Practitioner
Major Cancer Death Rates Are Down
Federal Practitioner
Benefits vs Risks of Cancer Screening
Federal Practitioner
Prostate Cancer in the Elderly
Federal Practitioner