Conference Coverage

Comparison of Initial Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Between VA and Nonveteran Populations

Susanibar Adaniya SP, Siegel ER, Govindarajan R

Abstract 46: 2015 AVAHO Meeting


 

References

Purpose: To compare the outcome of veterans with hepato-cellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with that of the non-veteran population.

Background: Hepatitis and HCC screening are routine in VA facilities. We hypothesized that VA subjects with HCC are diagnosed at earlier stages and tend to receive more loco-regional treatment compared with that of nonveteran patients.

Methods: Veterans with HCC were identified from the VISN 16 tumor registry data from 2007 to 2012. Stage, treatment characteristics, and survival data were collected. VA data were compared with published results from the Surveillance, Ep-idemiology, and End Results (SEER) population, spanning from 1998 to 2008. Disease stages were classified as local (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stages I, II, IIIA, IIIB), regional (AJCC stages IIIC and IVA), and distant/ unknown (AJCC stages IV, IVB, and unknown). Paired t test for continuous variables and a chi-square test for categorical ones were performed.

Results: One thousand thirty-five VA patients with HCC were identified, and 53.1% of the cases had biopsy confirmation. The median age was 60 years (range 43-93); 99.4% were male; 63.4% were white, and 34.6% were African American; 76.4% had a history of alcohol use; 47.3% were positive for hepatitis C; 2.1% were positive for hepatitis B; and 1.1% were positive for both. At diagnosis, 74.4% had local, 7.2% had regional, and 7.6% had distant disease; 30.5% received loco-regional treatment at first (5.7% surgical resection, 1.2% ethanol ablation, 22.2% only transarterial chemoembolization [TACE], 1.5% other local tumor-destruction thera-pies). Sorafenib was used in 19.2% patients. Median overall survival of all subjects was 12 months (interquartile range 3.5-33.4 mo) and 16.6, 6.0 and 2.9 months for local, re-gional, and distant disease, respectively. Survival benefit was seen with TACE (P < .001) and ethanol injection (P = .005). When compared with the SEER population, VA subjects had more local disease at diagnosis (74.4% vs 41.3%, P < .0001) and received more loco-regional therapy (32.4% vs 22.6 %, P < .0001).

Conclusions: Veterans with HCC are diagnosed at earlier stages and receive more loco-regional therapy compared with nonveteran subjects with HCC.

Recommended Reading

Audiologic Rehabilitative Service Utilization Among Veterans Exposed to Cisplatin: A Retrospective Review
Federal Practitioner
Veterans With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Characteristics and Treatment
Federal Practitioner
Best Practices: Utilization of Oncology Pharmacists in the VA
Federal Practitioner
Prevalence of Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Informed Consent Among Veteran Males Aged 55 to 69 Years
Federal Practitioner
Making Distress Screening Useful for Nursing and Social Work
Federal Practitioner
PSA Response Rates Far Exceeded Expectations in Treating Asymptomatic, Androgen-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Abiraterone
Federal Practitioner
A Retrospective Evaluation of Outcomes in Veteran Patients With Agent Orange Exposure and Prostate Cancer
Federal Practitioner
Incident Chronic Kidney Disease Following Kidney Cancer Surgery
Federal Practitioner
The Efficacy of Abiraterone Pre-and Postdocetaxel and Sequential Use of Enzalutamide After Abiraterone in Veteran Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Carcinoma
Federal Practitioner
Improving the Accuracy of Ordering and Reporting for Send-Out Laboratory Studies
Federal Practitioner