Clinical Topics & News

Robotic Surgery for Older Cancer Patients

Pelvic cancer patients may see greater benefits from robotic surgery vs traditional open surgery.


 

A review by researchers from Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France, and McGill University, Montreal showed that surgery by robot—rather than traditional open surgery—may improve outcomes in elderly patients with pelvic cancer, however the research is sparse. For instance, only 6 published studies specifically address surgery in the elderly with endometrial cancer, the most common gynecologic malignancy in the western world. However, because surgery is challenging for these often-frail patients, minimally invasive (or minimal access) surgery could be the answer. When comparing robotics to standard laparoscopy in treating endometrial cancer, the data suggest significantly less blood loss, reduced operative time, and higher node counts.

Related: A Team Approach to Nonmelanotic Skin Cancer Procedures

Similar to many others, the researchers’ academic center was slow to adopt minimally invasive standard (MIS) laparoscopy. But within 2 years of the introduction of robotic surgery in 2007, more than 95% of patients requiring surgery to treat endometrial cancer undergo MIS. Now, the surgery is offered to each operable patient unless the cancer cannot be extracted intact or in a 15-cm diameter endobag via the vagina.

Related: Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients May Be at Greater Risk for Cancer

The researchers note that the MIS procedure has some unique risks. For example, once the patient is “docked” to the robot, the Trendelenburg position can’t be reversed without undocking. This may adversely affect the respiratory and cardiovascular system. Despite case reports about such adverse effects, though, the researchers say most data support the safety of robotic surgery in the elderly. Moreover, the newest versions of robots allow for multiple quadrant access without the need to undock.

Related:Gene Expression Signatures in Breast Cancer: A Surgical Oncologist’s Perspective

The oncologic safety of robotic surgery seems similar to that of open surgery or laparoscopic surgery. After 2 years of follow-up in 1 study, rates of progression-free survival were similar for the different methods. The researchers advise surgeons to work toward improving preoperative frailty assessments that will help tailor the right surgery for the right subgroup of elderly patients.

Lavoué V, Gotlieb W. Cancers (Basel). 2016;8(1):E12.
doi: 10.3390/cancers8010012.

Recommended Reading

Palliative Radiotherapy for the Management of Metastatic Cancer
Federal Practitioner
ICOO: Approach to opioids for cancer pain evolves
Federal Practitioner
Updates on Cancer Survivorship Care Planning
Federal Practitioner
Putting the Focus on Quality of Life in Cancer Care
Federal Practitioner
Families Perceive Few Benefits From Aggressive End-of-Life Care
Federal Practitioner
MAVERIC Precision Oncology Program
Federal Practitioner
The Cost of Oncology Drugs: A Pharmacy Perspective, Part I
Federal Practitioner
A Patient Navigation Model for Veterans Traveling for Cancer Care
Federal Practitioner
Implementation of a Precision Oncology Program as an Exemplar of a Learning Health Care System in the VA
Federal Practitioner
A Systems Engineering and Decision-Support Tool to Enhance Care of Veterans Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer
Federal Practitioner

Related Articles