Article

Sustained Remissions After Discontinuation of Ibrutinib in Relapsed/Refractory CLL: A Basis for Reducing Drug Toxicity and Treatment Costs?

Abstract 17: 2016 AVAHO Meeting


 

In contrast to traditional chemotherapy, patients responding to biological or targeted therapies often are treated indefinitely until progression or toxicity. This therapeutic model, however, increases treatment costs, may induce greater toxicity and theoretically could select for earlier emergence of drug resistance. Moreover, little data are available regarding the outcomes of patients who discontinue targeted therapies after achieving remission. In this regard, we report 2 patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who chose to stop therapy unrelated to toxicity or disease status after the induction of remission by the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib.

Patient A started ibrutinib for progressive CLL at an absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) of 137,000 mm3 and recurrent hemolytic anemia. After 5 months, the hemolysis had resolved (Hgb 15.6 g/dL), while the ALC had declined to 9,200 mm3. Treatment was then interrupted due to patient preference. One month after drug discontinuation, the ALC was in the normal range at 1,400 mm3 and remained within or near the normal range for a total of 12 months. Two months later, the ALC was again markedly elevated at 68,000 mm3 and anemia recurred. The patient then agreed to restart ibrutinib. After 4 months of re-treatment, he has had prompt resolution of the anemia and achieved a partial remission thus far.

Patient B was started on ibrutinib for a rising ALC (26,000 mm3) and severe hemolytic anemia. After 9 months of treatment, the hemoglobin was 13 g/dL and the ALC was in the normal range at 3,300 mm3. Due to unrelated medical problems, ibrutinib therapy was stopped. Currently, 6 months since drug discontinuation, the ALC remains in the normal range, and no other signs of CLL are present.

These clinical observations suggest that interruption of ibrutinib may be feasible in at least some CLL patients who achieve remission. Even if flow cytometry were performed at monthly intervals to detect early recurrence and ensure prompt re-institution of therapy, the cost savings would still be considerable. Of course, clinical trials will be necessary to confirm equivalent long-term efficacy and overall survival for intermittent versus continuous ibrutinib therapy in CLL.

Recommended Reading

Vismodegib-Induced Rash: A Case Report
Federal Practitioner
Adjuvant and Salvage Radiation Therapy Following Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Review of a Single Institution
Federal Practitioner
How Can VA Optimize Palliative Oncology Care? The AVAHO Palliative Care Research Subcommittee Is Laying the Groundwork for Productive Collaboration
Federal Practitioner
Oncology Drug Cost Savings Initiative: A VA Medical Center Outpatient Oncology Clinic (ONCVAMC) Experience
Federal Practitioner
Opinions of Clinical Oncology Pharmacy Specialists on Utilization and Usefulness of National Criteria for Use Documents: A Quality Improvement Pilot Project
Federal Practitioner
Ototoxicity From Cisplatin: Who Is at Risk and Who May Benefit From Treatment?
Federal Practitioner
Defining Quality Cancer Survivorship Care: Symptom Burden and Distress in Veteran Cancer Survivors. VA Puget Sound Cancer Survivorship Clinic
Federal Practitioner
The Veteran Symptom Assessment Screen (VSAS) as an Alternate for the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCNDT) Distress Thermometer
Federal Practitioner
Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients With Mutated Kirsten Rat Sarcoma-2 Virus Oncogene and Elevated Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Have Poor Survival
Federal Practitioner
The Impact of an Integrated Veterans Health Administration RN Disease Management Program: The Oncology Aspect
Federal Practitioner