Original Research

Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Clozapine Use: A National Survey of Veterans Affairs Prescribers

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Strengths and Limitations

The strengths of this study lie in directly assessing HCP perceptions of barriers and facilitators. It is ultimately up to each individual HCP to decide to use clozapine. Addressing the concerns of these HCPs will be advantageous in efforts to increase clozapine utilization. Additionally, to the authors’ knowledge this is the first study to assess provider characteristics and knowledge of clozapine in relation to utilization rates.

The method of distribution was a major limitation of this study. This survey was distributed via national e-mail listservs; however, no listserv exists within the VA that targets all psychiatric providers. This study relied on the psychiatry chiefs and psychiatric pharmacists within each facility to further disseminate the survey, which could have led to lower response rates than what may be gathered via more direct contact methods. In addition, targeting psychiatric section chiefs and pharmacists may have introduced response bias. Another limitation to this study was the small number of responses. It is possible that this study was not adequately powered to detect significant differences in clozapine prescribing based on HCP characteristics or clozapine clinic availability. Further studies investigating the impact of provider characteristics on clozapine utilization are warranted.

Conclusion

Even though clozapine is an effective medication for TRS, providers underutilize it for a variety of reasons. Commonly identified barriers to prescribing in this study included frequent monitoring requirements, logistics of prescribing (including the REMS program and transportation for laboratory monitoring), pharmacotherapy preferences, and concern about the potential AEs. Facilitators identified in this study included implementation of clozapine clinics, having a specified contact point within the facility to assist with administrative responsibility, educational sessions, and the ability to utilize outside laboratories.

While some of these barriers and facilitators cannot be fully addressed without national policy change, individual facilities should make every effort to identify institution-specific concerns and address these. Clozapine clinic implementation and educational sessions appear to be reasonable considerations. This study did not identify any HCP characteristics that significantly impacted the likelihood of prescribing clozapine aside from self-rated comfort and familiarity with clozapine. However, further studies are needed to fully assess the impact of provider characteristics on clozapine utilization.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Standardizing the Use of Mental Health Screening Instruments in Patients With Pain (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
Assessing Refill Data Among Different Classes of Antidepressants (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
New acute pain guidelines from the ACP and AAFP have limitations
Federal Practitioner
More female specialists, but gender gap persists in pay, survey finds
Federal Practitioner
Suicide rates up significantly among adolescents, young adults
Federal Practitioner
Understanding the enduring power of caste
Federal Practitioner
Suicidality jumped in Israel during spring COVID-19 lockdown
Federal Practitioner
FDA orders stronger warnings on benzodiazepines
Federal Practitioner
Suicide in America: The urban-rural divide
Federal Practitioner
COVID-19’s psychological impact gets a name
Federal Practitioner

Related Articles