Conference Coverage

Healthy lifestyle may offset genetic risk in prostate cancer


 

FROM AACR 2021

A counterbalance to genetic risk

Dr. Plym observed that the rate of lethal disease in men with the best lifestyle scores matched the rate for the study population as a whole (3%), suggesting that healthy lifestyle may counterbalance high genetic risk.

She added that previous research has confirmed physical activity as a protective factor, but more study is needed to shed light on the relative benefit of the healthy lifestyle components.

In addition, further research is necessary to explain why the benefit was limited to lethal prostate cancer risk in men with the highest genetic risk.

Dr. Plym speculated that the genetic variants contributing to a high PRS may also be the variants that have the strongest interaction with lifestyle factors. For men with a genetic predisposition to prostate cancer, she added, these findings underscore the potential value of surveillance.

“Our findings add to current evidence suggesting that men with a high genetic risk may benefit from a targeted prostate cancer screening program, aiming at detecting a potentially lethal prostate cancer while it is still curable,” she said.

Charles Swanton, MBPhD, of the Francis Crick Institute and UCL Cancer Institute in London, raised the possibility that competing risk issues could be at play.

If a healthy lifestyle leads to longer life, he asked, does that make it more likely that patients will live long enough to die from their prostate cancer because they are not dying from cardiovascular disease, complications of diabetes, etc.? In that case, is the healthy lifestyle really affecting prostate cancer at all?

Dr. Plym responded that, among those in the highest genetic risk group with an unhealthy lifestyle, the increased risk for prostate cancer exceeded the risk for other illnesses.

This study was funded by the DiNovi Family Foundation, the National Cancer Institute, the William Casey Foundation, the Swedish Society for Medical Research, and the Prostate Cancer Foundation. Dr. Plym declared no conflicts of interest. Dr. Swanton disclosed relationships with numerous companies, including Pfizer, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Aspirin linked to reduced bladder, breast cancer mortality
Federal Practitioner
Managing cancer outpatients during the pandemic: Tips from MSKCC
Federal Practitioner
Declines in PSA screening may account for rise in metastatic prostate cancers
Federal Practitioner
Liquid vs. tissue biopsy in advanced prostate cancer: Why not both?
Federal Practitioner
CCR score can guide treatment decisions after radiation in prostate cancer
Federal Practitioner
How has the pandemic affected rural and urban cancer patients?
Federal Practitioner
Surveillance after testicular cancer: New approaches slash radiation exposure
Federal Practitioner
Bladder cancer indication withdrawn for durvalumab
Federal Practitioner
FDA scrutinizes cancer therapies granted accelerated approval
Federal Practitioner
Cancer screening stopped by pandemic: Repercussions to come?
Federal Practitioner