Latest News

The robot comes to mastectomy, but cancer outcomes data not attached


 

Surgeons only get one body

Intuitive has been hugely successful in developing and marketing its da Vinci system around the world for general and oncologic surgeries, with more than 1 million surgeries in 2018, a greater than sevenfold increase in 10 years, according to the authors of a new essay published in the June issue of the Annals of Surgery. The authors include breast surgeon Rosa F. Hwang, MD, of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, who is also an investigator for the Intuitive trial.

However, robotic mastectomy is still a new surgery – only about 150 patients have been treated in the world, mostly in Italy, France, Taiwan, and Korea, the authors noted.

Despite such small numbers, “there’s a lot of interest in bringing this to the United States,” said Dr. Park.

One of the arguments in favor of robotic mastectomy for nipple-sparing procedures has nothing to do with patients. Instead, it is improved ergonomics – the robot makes a tough surgery easier on the surgeon.

Even stalwart robot critic Dr. Margenthaler conceded that this was possibly a winning feature.

“Nipple-sparing mastectomy is a very physically demanding procedure for the surgeon, resulting in higher rates of neck and back pain and fatigue compared with a standard skin-sparing approach,” she noted. She suggested, however, that practitioners of traditional mastectomy ought to first experiment with changes to patient positioning and incision placement to alleviate stress before looking to the robot for change.

When this news organization interviewed NorthShore University’s Dr. Kopkash, she had conducted four nipple-sparing mastectomies in the previous week. “It’s a difficult procedure on our bodies. I just turned 40 and I’m considered young for a surgeon. We get one body for our career and we have to figure out ways to make it work and protect it.”

Intuitive Surgical is funding the five-center clinical trial of robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy, and UT Southwestern is funding its own trial. The Ohio State trial is funded by the university and a Pelotonia Idea Grant. Dr. Noorchashm and Dr. Margenthaler have no relevant financial disclosures.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Pregnancy effect on chemotherapy does not affect maternal breast cancer outcomes
Federal Practitioner
Genomic signature predicts safety of omitting RT in early breast cancer
Federal Practitioner
Promising HER2+/HR– breast cancer survival with de-escalated therapy
Federal Practitioner
Freezing breast cancer to death avoids surgery: Why not further along?
Federal Practitioner
DCIS: Biosignature helps guide postlumpectomy decisions
Federal Practitioner
Rapid update to ASCO breast cancer guidelines after OlympiA data
Federal Practitioner
No increase in breast cancer risk with fertility treatments
Federal Practitioner
CDC notes sharp declines in breast and cervical cancer screening
Federal Practitioner
Huge trial casts doubt on bisphosphonates for breast cancer
Federal Practitioner
Cancer mortality continues to drop in females as breast cancer reversal looms
Federal Practitioner