Commentary

What’s in a Name? The Problematic Term “Provider”

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Reversing the Trend

Increasing awareness among patients, their families, health professions students, and health care colleagues and administrators of the importance of traditional nomenclature is a first step in reversing this trend or mitigating its impact. If an overarching generic term is required, then health care professional, clinician, or practitioner are preferred.10,12 Fifteen years ago, the Southern California Permanente Medical Group prohibited the use of the word provider to describe physicians, and its editorial style deemed it cold and institutional.16 Many, but not all, state, regional, or national medical associations and journals avoid provider in their names or titles.

I am encouraged that this journal—drawing its audience from several government health care agencies—is named Federal Practitioner rather than Federal Provider. This is reasonable and accurate, as practitioner refers to the practice of a profession, usually associated with health care.

I hope other professions can resist this trend. Lawyers are not considered legal aid providers, and teachers are not called knowledge providers.3 We do not refer to airline pilots as air transportation providers or musicians as instrument-playing melody providers. Many veterans likely would be offended if they were referred to as Constitution support and defense providers rather than by the military branch-specific titles that they earned through dedication, training, and sacrifice. The individuals in these examples demonstrate commitment to representing clients, educating students, flying passengers, playing instruments, or ensuring national defense. As health care professionals, our commitment to treating patients is equally important.4

Language matters when it comes to people feeling respected and achieving their full potential.1 I encourage government health care agencies to stop referring to us as providers and resume using traditional nomenclature. This will demonstrate genuine respect for us, transparency for the patients we serve, and recognition that caring for the sick is a calling, not a commodity.

Dedication

The author dedicates this article to his father John E. Scarff, Jr, a physician and United States Army veteran.

Pages

Recommended Reading

‘Locker room talk’ about death: Time for oncologists to stop
Federal Practitioner
Outreach Finds Veterans Unaware of Service Connection
Federal Practitioner
VA to Provide Services to Veterans With ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Discharges
Federal Practitioner
Military sexual trauma tied to risk for hypertension
Federal Practitioner
Study finds paying people to participate in clinical trials is not unethical
Federal Practitioner
U.S. study finds racial, gender differences in surgical treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
Federal Practitioner
Many patients, doctors unaware of advancements in cancer care
Federal Practitioner
Cement found in man’s heart after spinal surgery
Federal Practitioner
Benzene prompts recalls of spray antifungals and sunscreens
Federal Practitioner
Operational Curriculum and Research Initiatives: Shaping the Future of Military Medicine
Federal Practitioner