Program Profile

What Federal Practitioners Need to Know About the National Practitioner Data Bank

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

In addition, final adverse licensure and certification actions are those taken against health care practitioners, providers, or suppliers, regardless of whether the final adverse action is the subject of a pending appeal.3 These must be reported.

Additional Reporting Requirements

Federal hospitals or federal government agencies administering health care services may have additional reporting requirements besides reporting adjudicated actions, exclusions, civil judgments, and criminal convictions. They may include submitting reports under a memorandum of understanding on clinical privileges actions and medical malpractice payments.3 The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has entered into memorandums of understanding with the US Department of Defense and the US Department of Veteran Affairs to ensure their participation in the NPDB system. Federal hospitals should refer to applicable memorandums of understanding and agency-specific policies for guidance on carrying out their reporting responsibilities.4

Responding to a Report

The NPDB sends a letter to health care practitioners when an organization submits a report about the practitioner. The letter has the report number and a password is required to view the report.2 Health care practitioners also can order a self-query online to view any reports on them in the NPDB.

The subject of the report can also add a statement and dispute the report. The statement is an opportunity to provide additional information the subject would like to have included in the report. If the subject disagrees with the accuracy of a report or believes it does not meet NPDB reporting requirements, it can be disputed. The dispute will become part of the report. When the subject adds a statement or dispute, the NPDB notifies the reporting organization and all organizations that received the report within the previous 3 years of the report activity.

Health care practitioners must contact the reporting organization to try to resolve their dispute. If the subject of the report has contacted or tried to contact the reporting organization and could not resolve the dispute after 60 days, or if, within the 60-day period, the organization informs the subject that it will not modify the report, that individual may request dispute resolution.Requesting dispute resolution does not remove the report from the NPDB.

Dispute Resolution

Dispute resolution is a request for the HHS secretary to review the report. The secretary authorizes the Division of Practitioner Data Bank (DPDB) to conduct this review. The DPDB is responsible for oversight of the NPDB. The subject of the report will need to submit relevant supporting documentation to request dispute resolution. This documentation should show that the information in the report is not accurate or that the action is not reportable. Also, proof should be included that the subject contacted or attempted to contact the reporting organization. Submitting large volumes or extraneous documentation can delay the review process.

A dispute resolution manager will review the case and send the reporting organization a request for information if needed. The DPDB will send the subject of the report a courtesy copy of all correspondence. The dispute resolution timeline varies, as the DPDB reviews disputes in the order they are received. It completes a fair and thorough review based on the unique circumstances of each case and will review the case as soon as possible. Once the DPDB receives documentation from the subject and the reporting organization, it reviews the documentation to determine whether the report accurately reflects the record.

The DPDB decides to either maintain the report as is, correct it, or remove it from the NPDB. Once the process is complete, the dispute resolution manager sends a decision letter to the subject of the report and the reporting organization. The dispute resolution decision will appear in the report.

Recommended Reading

New HIV PrEP guidelines call for clinicians to talk to patients about HIV prevention meds
Federal Practitioner
Hire Veteran Health Heroes Act Meets Many Needs
Federal Practitioner
Physician gender pay gap isn’t news; health inequity is rampant
Federal Practitioner
Califf plans work on opioids, accelerated approvals on return to FDA
Federal Practitioner
FDA backs Pfizer booster for 12- to 15-year-olds
Federal Practitioner
CDC defends new COVID guidance as doctors raise concerns
Federal Practitioner
CDC to update mask recommendations as Omicron spreads
Federal Practitioner
Docs pen open letter to support Fauci against partisan ‘attacks’
Federal Practitioner
Feds’ website for free at-home COVID tests launches day early
Federal Practitioner
The Balance of Truth-Telling and Respect for Confidentiality: The Ethics of Case Reports
Federal Practitioner