A low-sodium diet was not associated with a reduction in future clinical events in a new study in ambulatory patients with heart failure. But there was a moderate benefit on quality of life and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class.
Dr. Justin Ezekowitz
The results of the SODIUM-HF trial were presented April 2 at the annual scientific sessions of the American College of Cardiology, conducted virtually and in person in Washington. They were also simultaneously published online in the Lancet.
The study found that a strategy to reduce dietary sodium intake to less than 1,500 mg daily was not more effective than usual care in reducing the primary endpoint of risk for hospitalization or emergency department visits due to cardiovascular causes or all-cause death at 12 months.
“This is the largest and longest trial to look at the question of reducing dietary sodium in heart failure patients,” lead author Justin Ezekowitz, MBBCh, from the Canadian VIGOUR Center at the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, told this news organization.
But he pointed out that there were fewer events than expected in the study, which was stopped early because of a combination of futility and practical difficulties caused by the COVID pandemic, so it could have been underpowered. Dr. Ezekowitz also suggested that a greater reduction in sodium than achieved in this study or a longer follow-up may be required to show an effect on clinical events.
“We hope others will do additional studies of sodium as well as other dietary recommendations as part of a comprehensive diet for heart failure patients,” he commented.
Dr. Ezekowitz said that the study results did not allow blanket recommendations to be made on reducing sodium intake in heart failure.
But he added: “I don’t think we should write off sodium reduction in this population. I think we can tell patients that reducing dietary sodium may potentially improve symptoms and quality of life, and I will continue to recommend reducing sodium as part of an overall healthy diet. We don’t want to throw the baby out with the bathwater.”
Dr. Ezekowitz noted that heart failure is associated with neurohormonal activation and abnormalities in autonomic control that lead to sodium and water retention; thus, dietary restriction of sodium has been historically endorsed as a mechanism to prevent fluid overload and subsequent clinical outcomes; however, clinical trials so far have shown mixed results.
“The guidelines used to strongly recommend a reduction in sodium intake in heart failure patients, but this advice has backed off in recent years because of the lack of data. Most heart failure guidelines now do not make any recommendations on dietary sodium,” he said.
SODIUM-HF was a pragmatic, multinational, open-label, randomized trial conducted in six countries (Australia, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and New Zealand), which included 809 patients (median age, 67 years) with chronic heart failure (NYHA functional class II–III) who were receiving optimally tolerated guideline-directed medical treatment. They were randomly assigned to usual care according to local guidelines or a low-sodium diet of less than 100 mmol (<1,500 mg/day). Patients with a baseline sodium intake of less than 1,500 mg/day were excluded.
In the intervention group, patients were asked to follow low-sodium menus developed by dietitians localized to each region. They also received behavioral counseling by trained dietitians or physicians or nurses.
Dietary sodium intake was assessed by using a 3-day food record (including 1 weekend day) at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months in both groups and, for the intervention group, also at 3 and 9 months to monitor and support dietary adherence.
Dr. Ezekowitz explained that although the best method for measuring sodium levels would normally be a 24-hour urine sodium, this would be impractical in a large clinical trial. In addition, he pointed out that urinary sodium is not an accurate measure of actual sodium levels in patients taking diuretics, so it is not a good measure to use in a heart failure population.
“The food record method of assessing sodium levels has been well validated; I think we measured it as accurately as we could have done,” he added.
Results showed that between baseline and 12 months, the median sodium intake decreased from 2,286 mg/day to 1,658 mg/day in the low-sodium group and from 2,119 mg/day to 2,073 mg/day in the usual care group. The median difference between groups was 415 mg/day at 12 months.
By 12 months, events comprising the primary outcome (hospitalization or emergency department visits due to cardiovascular causes or all-cause death) had occurred in 15% of patients in the low-sodium diet group and 17% of those in the usual care group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.63 - 1.26]; P = .53).
All-cause death occurred in 6% of patients in the low-sodium diet group and 4% of those in the usual care group (HR, 1.38; P = .32). Cardiovascular-related hospitalization occurred in 10% of the low-sodium group and 12% of the usual care group (HR, 0.82; P = .36), and cardiovascular-related emergency department visits occurred in 4% of both groups (HR, 1.21; P = .60).
The absence of treatment effect for the primary outcome was consistent across most prespecified subgroups, including those with higher vs lower baseline sodium intake. But there was a suggestion of a greater reduction in the primary outcome in individuals younger than age 65 years than in those age 65 years and older.
Quality-of-life measures on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) suggested a benefit in the low-sodium group, with mean between-group differences in the change from baseline to 12 months of 3.38 points in the overall summary score, 3.29 points in the clinical summary score, and 3.77 points in the physical limitation score (all differences were statistically significant).
There was no significant difference in 6-minute-walk distance at 12 months between the low-sodium diet group and the usual care group.
NYHA functional class at 12 months differed significantly between groups; the low-sodium diet group had a greater likelihood of improving by one NYHA class than the usual care group (odds ratio, 0.59; P = .0061).
No safety events related to the study treatment were reported in either group.
Dr. Ezekowitz said that to investigate whether longer follow-up may show a difference in events, further analyses are planned at 2 years and 5 years.