Guidelines

NAMS affirms value of hormone therapy for menopausal women


 

FROM MENOPAUSE

Challenges, research gaps, and goals

“Barriers to the use of hormone therapy include lack of access to high quality care,” Dr. Faubion said in an interview. The NAMS website, menopause.org, features an option to search for a NAMS-certified provider by ZIP code, she noted.

“Coverage of hormone therapy is highly variable and depends on the insurance company, but most women have access to one form or another with insurance coverage,” she said. “We need to continue to advocate for adequate coverage of menopause symptom treatments, including hormone therapy, so that women’s symptoms – which can significantly affect quality of life – are adequately managed.

“Additional research is needed on the thrombotic risk (venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, and stroke) of oral versus transdermal therapies (including different formulations, doses, and durations of therapy),” Dr. Faubion told this news organization. “More clinical trial data are needed to confirm or refute the potential beneficial effects of hormone therapy on coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality when initiated in perimenopause or early postmenopause,” she said.

Other areas for research include “the breast effects of different estrogen preparations, including the role for selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) and tissue selective estrogen complex therapies, optimal progestogen or SERM regimens to prevent endometrial hyperplasia, the relationship between vasomotor symptoms and the risk for heart disease and cognitive changes, and the risks of premature ovarian insufficiency,” Dr. Faubion emphasized.

Looking ahead, “Studies are needed on the effects of longer use of low-dose vaginal estrogen therapy after breast or endometrial cancer, extended use of hormone therapy in women who are early initiators, improved tools to personalize or individualize benefits and risks of hormone therapy, and the role of aging and genetics,” said Dr. Faubion. Other areas for further research include “the long-term benefits and risks on women’s health of lifestyle modification or complementary or nonhormone therapies, if chosen in addition to or over hormone therapy for vasomotor symptoms, bone health, and cardiovascular disease risk reduction,” she added.

The complete statement was published in Menopause: The Journal of the North American Menopause Society.

The position statement received no outside funding. The authors had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Bone risk: Is time since menopause a better predictor than age?
Federal Practitioner
Midlife cardiovascular conditions tied to greater cognitive decline in women
Federal Practitioner
How safe is a drug holiday from bisphosphonates for osteoporosis?
Federal Practitioner
Early menopause, early dementia risk, study suggests
Federal Practitioner
Big missed opportunities for BP control in premenopausal women
Federal Practitioner
Some reproductive factors linked with risk of dementia
Federal Practitioner
Hormones account for 10% of lipid changes after menopause
Federal Practitioner
Nonhormonal drug for menopause symptoms passes phase 3 test
Federal Practitioner
Hormone therapy didn’t increase recurrence or mortality in women treated for breast cancer
Federal Practitioner
Routine weight counseling urged for women at midlife
Federal Practitioner