Clinical Topics & News

Evaluating Progression Free Survival Among Veteran Population With Stage IV Non-Small Cell Immunotherapy vs Chemo- Immunotherapy


 

Background

Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors against advanced stage NSCLC has been associated with significant reduction in overall disease morbidity and mortality. However, despite the significant survival benefit, tumors invariably relapse. It is important to understand the pattern of progression and the progression free survival (PFS) to better predict disease outcomes and modify treatment approach.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 74 veterans with new diagnosis of stage IV NSCLC who received 2 or more cycles of immunotherapy with/without concurrent chemotherapy between 2015-2021 at the Stratton VA Medical Center. IRB approval was obtained. Fisher exact probability test and Kaplan-Meier estimators were used to analyze data with level of significance P < .05.

Results

Out of 74 patients, 38 patients were identified who received immunotherapy alone (Group A; n = 23, 60.5%) vs chemo-immunotherapy (Group B; n = 15, 39.5%). Baseline characteristics of Group A revealed median age 70 (IQR, 65-78), adenocarcinoma (n = 10, 43.4%), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 12, 52.1%), PD-L1 > 50% expression (n = 21, 91.3%), molecular testing positive for EGFR in 1 patient, otherwise negative for ROS, ALK, EGFR and BRAF mutations in all patients. Similarly, in Group B, median age 66 (IQR, 63-72), adenocarcinoma (n = 6, 40%), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 8, 53.3%), PD-L1 > 50% expression (n = 3, 20%), no mutations noted on molecular testing. Out of 38 patients, disease progression was noted in 19 patients, 10 in Group A (progression at initial site and new site n = 5, 50%) vs 9 in Group B (progression at initial site and new site, n = 6, 66.7%). Most common sites of progression included local and distant lymph nodes, brain, bone, and liver. Using the Kaplan-Meier analysis, median progression free survival (PFS) from start of immunotherapy till evidence of progression on imaging was 11 months in Group A and 7 months in Group B, P = .22. Our study recognized widespread metastases at the time of diagnosis (P = .03) as a possible factor affecting progression of diseases in Group A compared to Group B.

Conclusion

We conclude that although no statistically significant association was noted between the progression free survival between the two groups, the increased median PFS in immunotherapy only group is worth additional investigation. We recommend further large-scale studies to explore this association.

Recommended Reading

Lung cancer treatment combo may be effective after ICI failure
Federal Practitioner
One in four NSCLC patients respond poorly to COVID-19 vaccine
Federal Practitioner
Smoking cessation with lung screening ups quit rates
Federal Practitioner
Air pollution contribution to lung cancer may be underestimated
Federal Practitioner
FDA approves Enhertu (trastuzumab deruxtecan) for HER2 lung cancer
Federal Practitioner
A look at lung cancer screening in resource-limited countries
Federal Practitioner
Safety Profile of Mutant EGFR-TK Inhibitors in Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis
Federal Practitioner
Nearly 30% of U.S. cancer deaths linked to smoking
Federal Practitioner
Molecular Profiling of Lung Malignancies in Veterans: What We Have Learned About the Impact of Agent Orange Exposure
Federal Practitioner
MYO1E DNA Methylation in U.S. Military Veterans With Adenocarcinoma of the Lung Is Associated With Increased Mortality Risk
Federal Practitioner