From the Journals

Cardiorespiratory fitness linked to cancer risk, mortality?


 

TOPLINE:

Higher levels of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) may offer protection from colon and lung cancer and from lung and prostate cancer mortality among men, a large Swedish cohort study suggests.

METHODOLOGY:

  • A prospective cohort study included 177,709 Swedish men (mean age, 42; mean body mass index, 26 kg/m2) who completed an occupational health profile assessment and were followed for a mean of 9.6 years.
  • CRF was assessed by determining maximal oxygen consumption during an aerobic fitness test, known as a submaximal Åstrand cycle ergometer test.
  • Participants reported physical activity habits, lifestyle, and perceived health.
  • Data on prostate, colon, and lung cancer incidence and mortality were derived from national registers.
  • Outcomes from three higher CRF groups (low, > 25-35; moderate, > 35-45; high, > 45 mL/min per kg) were compared with those from the very low CRF group (25 mL/min per kg or less). Models were adjusted for various factors, including age, BMI, education, dietary habits, comorbidity, and smoking.

TAKEAWAY:

  • During follow-up, investigators identified 1,918 prostate, 499 colon, and 283 lung cancer cases as well as 141 prostate, 207 lung, and 152 colon cancer deaths.
  • In the fully adjusted model, higher CRF levels were associated with a significantly lower risk for colon cancer (hazard ratio, 0.72 for moderate; HR, 0.63 for high).
  • In this model, higher CRF was also associated with a lower risk of death from prostate cancer (HR, 0.67 for low; HR, 0.57 for moderate; HR, 0.29 for high).
  • For lung cancer mortality, only high CRF was associated with a significantly lower risk of death (HR, 0.41).
  • An association between CRF and lung cancer incidence (HR, 0.99) and death (HR, 0.99) was only evident among adults aged 60 and older.

IN PRACTICE:

“The clinical implications of these findings further emphasize the importance of CRF for possibly reducing cancer incidence and mortality,” the authors concluded. “It is important for the general public to understand that higher-intensity [physical activity] has greater effects on CRF and is likely to be more protective against the risk of developing and dying from certain cancers.”

SOURCE:

The study was led by Elin Ekblom-Bak, PhD, from the Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm. It was published online in JAMA Network Open.

LIMITATIONS:

The study was limited by voluntary participation, inclusion of only employed individuals, and estimations of CRF via submaximal tests. Data on smoking status were not optimal and there was a small number of cancer cases and deaths.

DISCLOSURES:

Funding was provided by the Swedish Cancer Society. The authors have reported no conflicts of interest.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

Severe strep infections rebound after pandemic lull
Federal Practitioner
Ruptured aneurysm turns MD couple into doctor-patient
Federal Practitioner
New cannabis laws, higher binge drinking rates linked
Federal Practitioner
Harvard medical school sued over stolen body part scandal
Federal Practitioner
Time for mental stress testing in ANOCA?
Federal Practitioner
New AAP framework seeks to help pediatricians monitor premature babies 
Federal Practitioner
Physician suicide roundtable: 8 important initiatives that can help 
Federal Practitioner
ESMO helps hematologists assess new cancer drugs
Federal Practitioner
Barriers to Implementation of Telehealth Pre-anesthesia Evaluation Visits in the Department of Veterans Affairs
Federal Practitioner
A tiny patch may someday do your patients’ lab work
Federal Practitioner