Latest News

Treating obesity: Will new drugs end the crisis?


 

Shifting from prevention to damage control

Less invasive and more scalable than surgery (only 1% of the eligible population gets bariatric surgery), the drugs offer doctors a safe, effective way to treat many patients with obesity. That’s cause for excitement, but concerns remain because they are expensive, costing about $800 to $1,300 per month out of pocket. Many health insurers, including Medicare, do not cover them for weight loss.

“You have this significant advance in obesity treatment, but very few will be able to access it,” said Gary Foster, PhD, adjunct professor of psychology in psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and chief scientific officer at WW (formerly Weight Watchers).

There is a push, including a proposed bill, to get Medicare to cover obesity medication. But given the expense of the drugs, the health economics do not support that move, according to an editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine. If Medicare were to cover obesity meds, the budget impact would likely be huge, potentially driving up premiums. If other payers followed suit, the impact could be felt across the U.S. health care system.

Other drawbacks include side effects – including nausea, diarrhea, stomach pain, and vomiting – that can be so bad that some patients can’t tolerate them.

And critically, the drugs do not deal with the root cause of the problem, said Robert Lustig, MD, an endocrinologist and pediatrician at the University of California, San Francisco, who has suggested that excess insulin is driving obesity. “No one has the disease that these drugs are treating. No one has GLP-1 deficiency. They’re bypassing the problem. They’re band-aiding the problem.”

Because the drugs work by mimicking starvation – they appear to curb hunger, so you eat less – people on them lose not just fat but also healthy lean mass, Dr. Lustig said.

Concerns about pancreatitis did not really bear out in postmarketing reports. (The drugs are still not recommended in people with pancreatitis or multiple endocrine neoplasia.) But predicting longer-term outcomes can be difficult, noted Dr. Lustig.

Then there are philosophical questions, said James Hill, PhD, director of the Nutrition Obesity Research Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.. “If you’re continuing to not exercise and eat not healthy foods and take a medication, is that success? Have we won when people are at a lower weight but not doing a healthy behavior?”

‘We can’t treat our way out of this’

The fact is, ending the obesity epidemic is a tall order, even for drugs as impressive as these.

“We can’t treat our way out of this,” said Jamy Ard, MD, codirector of Wake Forest Baptist Health Weight Management Center in Winston-Salem, N.C. “The treatments we have now are great, and there will be more coming. But we do need to figure out the prevention side of things.”

Dr. Seeley agreed but added that we can’t diet-and-exercise our way out either.

“There’s no switch to be flipped,” Dr. Seeley said. “If you told me we shouldn’t spend all this money on these drugs, we should spend it on prevention – great! What would we do?”

And prevention efforts won’t help the millions already living with health problems from obesity, Dr. Aronne said.

“Getting people to stop smoking prevents lung cancer. But stopping smoking doesn’t treat lung cancer,” Dr. Aronne said. “Once the physical changes occur in the lung that cause a tumor to grow, it’s too late. You have to think of obesity the same way.”

Dr. Seeley pointed out that “fearmongering” around the drugs highlights our lingering bias that obesity is a lifestyle issue that should not be medically treated.

“People say, ‘When you stop taking it, you’re going to gain the weight back,’ ” Dr. Seeley said. “There’s truth to that, but when you stop taking your hypertension medication, your blood pressure goes up. We don’t think of that as a [reason] for why you shouldn’t take your blood pressure medication. But that gets trumpeted into all these conversations about whether people [with obesity] should be treated at all.”

Like obesity, blood pressure was once thought to be a behavioral problem, Dr. Aronne said. But blood pressure meds prevent heart attacks and strokes. And it’s likely obesity meds will do the same.

One 55-year-old patient on the road to kidney failure lost weight on obesity medications, including semaglutide, Dr. Aronne said. Now, 6 years later, his kidney function is back to normal. “Normally, we think of kidney disease as irreversible,” Dr. Aronne said.

In that respect, these drugs should save money in the long run by virtue of heading off those health care costs, said Dr. Seeley, who imagines a future where obesity is not gone but better managed, like high blood pressure is now.

In the end, the drugs are another step toward what Dr. Aronne and many others have always pushed for: Treating obesity as a disease.

A version of this article originally appeared on WebMD.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Self-talk overhaul may help patients achieve weight loss
Federal Practitioner
BMI ‘vastly underestimates’ true obesity
Federal Practitioner
NAFLD increases risk for severe infections
Federal Practitioner
SURMOUNT-2: Tirzepatide rings up major weight loss in type 2 diabetes
Federal Practitioner
OASIS and PIONEER PLUS support high-dose oral semaglutide
Federal Practitioner
Triple-agonist retatrutide hits new weight loss highs
Federal Practitioner
Intermittent fasting, cutting calories give same weight loss
Federal Practitioner
In head and neck cancer, better outcomes seen in patients with overweight
Federal Practitioner
Tirzepatide: Therapeutic titan or costly cure?
Federal Practitioner
WHO plans to declare common sweetener as possible carcinogen
Federal Practitioner