Clinical Topics & News

Multiple Myeloma: Updates on Diagnosis and Management

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

to evaluate for possible soft tissue lesions when a bone survey is negative, or to evaluate for spinal cord compression.5 Additionally, an MRI should be performed in patients with SMM at the initial assessment, because focal lesions in the setting of SMM are associated with an increased risk to progression. 6 Since plain radiographs are usually abnormal only after ≥ 30% of the
bone is destroyed, an MRI offers a more sensitive image.

Two MM precursor syndromes are worth noting: MGUS and SMM. In evaluating a patient for possible MM, it is important to differentiate between MGUS, asymptomatic
SMM, and MM that requires treatment. 4 Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is diagnosed when a patient has a serum M protein that is < 3 g/dL, clonal bone marrow plasma cells < 10%, and no identifiable end organ damage. 5 Smoldering MM is diagnosed when either the serum M protein is > 3 g/dL or bone marrow clonal plasma cells are > 10% in the absence of end organ damage.

Symptomatic MM is characterized by > 10% clonal bone marrow involvement with end organ damage that includes hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, or bone lesions. The diagnostic criteria are summarized in Table 1. The International Myeloma Working Group produced updated guidelines in 2014, which now include patients with > 60% bone marrow involvement of plasma cells, serum FLC ratio of > 100, and > 1 focal lesions on an MRI study as symptomatic MM. 5,6

Most patients with MM will have a M protein produced by the malignant plasma cells detected on an SPEP or UPEP. The majority of immunoglobulins were IgG and IgA, whereas IgD and IgM were much less common. 2 A minority of patients will not have a detectable M protein on SPEP or UPEP. Some patients will produce only light chains and are designated as light-chain-only myeloma.For these patients, the FLC assay is useful for diagnosis and disease monitoring. Patients who have an absence of M protein on SPEP/UPEP and normal FLC assay ratios are considered to have nonsecretory myeloma. 7

Staging and Risk Stratification

Two staging systems are used to evaluate a patient’s prognosis: the Durie-Salmon staging system, which is based on tumor burden (Table 2); and the International Staging System (ISS), which uses a combination of serum beta 2 microglobulin (B2M) and serum albumin levels to produce a powerful and reproducible 3-stage classification and is more commonly used by hematologists due to its simplicity to use and reliable reproducibility (Table 3).

In the Durie-Salmon staging system, patients with stage I disease have a lower tumor burden, defined as hemoglobin > 10 g/dL, normal calcium level, no evidence of
lytic bone lesions, and low amounts of protein produced (IgG < 5 g/dL; IgA < 3 g/dL; urine protein < 4 g/d). Patients are classified as stage III if they have any of the following: hemoglobin < 8.5 g/dL, hypercalcemia with level > 12 mg/dL, bony lytic lesions, or high amounts of protein produced (IgG > 7 g/dL; IgA > 5 g/dL; or urine protein > 12 g/d). Patients with stage II disease do

Pages

Recommended Reading

Multiple Myeloma and Stroke: What’s the Risk?
AVAHO
The Long Legacy of Agent Orange
AVAHO
Consensus Statement Supporting the Recommendation for Single-Fraction Palliative Radiotherapy for Uncomplicated, Painful Bone Metastases
AVAHO
Treating Patients With Multiple Myeloma in the VA
AVAHO
Diagnosing Gastric Plasmacytoma
AVAHO
Multiple Myeloma: Updates on Diagnosis and Management
AVAHO
A New ‘Triplet’ Treatment for Multiple Myeloma
AVAHO
The Prognostic Value of Circulating Plasma Cells in Multiple Myeloma
AVAHO
Less lenalidomide may be more in frail elderly multiple myeloma patients
AVAHO
Differential Response to Carfilzomib Based on Initial Therapy With Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma
AVAHO