Conference Coverage

Assessment of Body Weight After Completion of Radiotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy and With or Without Prophylactic Feeding Tube Placement in Head and Neck Cancer

Reddy E, Moutafis E, Higby E, Huang C, Latif S, Park J

Abstract 17: 2015 AVAHO Meeting


 

Purpose: A majority of the patients with a diagnosis of locally advanced head and neck cancer receiving combined chemoradiotherapy experience mucositis, odynophagia, and dysphagia resulting in reduced oral intake and weight loss during the treatment. A prophylactic feeding tube is generally recommended for these patients to maintain body weight during the treatment. The purpose of this retrospective study is to understand the change in body weight from baseline to last follow-up after completion of radiotherapy or combined chemoradiotherapy and to assess the role of prophylactic feeding tube placement in maintaining body weight.

Methods: Thirty-seven patients with a diagnosis of locally advanced head and neck cancers were treated either with adjuvant or definitive radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy at Kansas City VA Medical Center during 2013. Eleven patients did not receive chemotherapy, and a majority of the patients did not receive prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. Twenty-six patient received cisplatin-based chemotherapy during radio-therapy; of these, 9 patients had no feeding tube and 17 patients received a prophylactic feeding tube. The radiation dose ranged from 60 to 70 Gy in 30 to 35 fractions. All these patients were followed on a regular basis, and weights were recorded on each visit. The follow-up period ranged from a minimum of 6 months to a maximum of 18 months. Results: Five patients died either from locoregional recurrence or distant metastases. The average weight loss for patients with combined modality treatments was 9.7% vs 6.3% for patients receiving no chemotherapy. The average weight loss for patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy and with prophylactic feeding tube placement was 7.4% com-pared with average weight loss of 16% for patients receiving chemotherapy and no prophylactic feeding tube placement. The majority of these patients both in the chemotherapy and the no chemotherapy groups never regained their baseline weight.

Conclusions: Patients receiving chemotherapy benefited from prophylactic feeding tube placement in maintaining body weight similar to patients receiving no chemotherapy.

Recommended Reading

Systems Automation for Cancer Surveillance: A Useful Tool for Tracking the Care of Head and Neck Cancer Patients in the Ear, Nose, and Throat Clinic
AVAHO
Effects of Feeding Tube Placement on Weight and Treatment Breaks in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Who Undergo Definitive Radiotherapy
AVAHO
Comparison of Low-Dose Platinum vs High-Dose Platinum vs Cetuximab and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Advanced Head and Neck Cancers
AVAHO
Cisplatin Is Associated With Prolonged Progression-Free Survival Compared With Cetuximab Among Veteran Patients With Stage 3 And 4 Head and Neck Cancer
AVAHO
Incorporation of Palliative Care With Chemotherapy and Radiation in Patients Treated for Head and Neck Cancer
AVAHO
Palliative Care for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
AVAHO
Radioactive Iodine Scintiphotos of a Man With Thyroid Cancer
AVAHO
Complete Heart Block in a Patient With Metastatic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
AVAHO
New Treatment Options for Metastatic Thyroid Cancer
AVAHO
Travel Burden and Distress in Veterans With Head and Neck Cancer
AVAHO