Conference Coverage

Did the FDA Black Box Warning Have Any Effect on Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Use?

Noxon V, Bennett C

Abstract 57: 2015 AVAHO Meeting


 

References

Background: Erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been used to treat chemotherapy-related anemia in cancer patients since 1993. Erythropoietin-stimulating agents are a useful substitute for blood transfusions for these patients; however, there were unacknowledged toxicities for ESAs when they were first administered. One such toxicity is venous thromboembolisms (VTEs). In March 2007, these toxicities were acknowledged by the FDA when a black box warning was issued for ESAs. This study aimed to observe ESA utilization trends along with VTE and transfusion rates to determine the effect of the black box warning

Methods: The 2002 to 2010 merged South Carolina Medicaid-Cancer Registry dataset was used to determine the effect of the FDA black box warning. Patients with breast, non-small cell lung, and colorectal cancer who were over 18 were determined from the cancer registry. Of these, chemotherapy users were identified. From the chemotherapy population, ESA users were identified from medical and pharmacy claims. The final sample contained those who had their first ESA claim after chemotherapy and not dual enrolled in Medicare. Qualitative analysis was done for trends, and logistic regression was used as a quantitative measure.

Results: Of the 3,689 cancer patients with chemotherapy, 1,315 (36%) had at least 1 ESA claim. The maximum rate of ESA patients was seen in 2006 (56%) followed by a decline to 43% in 2008 and 11% in 2010. Logistic regression showed a 78% reduction in the odds of receiving an ESA after the black box warning compared with before. Venous thromboembolism rates in ESA users declined from 0.6% in 2002 to 0.4% in 2009 and 2010. There is a 45% reduction in the odds of getting a VTE after the black box warning adjusting for clinical and demographic characteristics. Transfusion rates in ESA users increased from 0.2% in 2002 to 0.3% in 2009 and 2010. There is a 96% increase in the odds of getting a transfusion after the black box warning adjusting for clinical and demographic characteristics.

Conclusions: The decline of ESA use and VTE rates and an increase in transfusions look to be related to the black box warning.

Recommended Reading

Veterans With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Characteristics and Treatment
AVAHO
Best Practices: Utilization of Oncology Pharmacists in the VA
AVAHO
Prevalence of Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Informed Consent Among Veteran Males Aged 55 to 69 Years
AVAHO
Making Distress Screening Useful for Nursing and Social Work
AVAHO
PSA Response Rates Far Exceeded Expectations in Treating Asymptomatic, Androgen-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Abiraterone
AVAHO
Comparison of Initial Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Between VA and Nonveteran Populations
AVAHO
A Retrospective Evaluation of Outcomes in Veteran Patients With Agent Orange Exposure and Prostate Cancer
AVAHO
Incident Chronic Kidney Disease Following Kidney Cancer Surgery
AVAHO
The Efficacy of Abiraterone Pre-and Postdocetaxel and Sequential Use of Enzalutamide After Abiraterone in Veteran Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Carcinoma
AVAHO
Improving the Accuracy of Ordering and Reporting for Send-Out Laboratory Studies
AVAHO