Conference Coverage

National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer Versus Veteran Symptom Assessment Screen: Year in Review at the Cleveland VAMC

Abstract 12: 2017 AVAHO Meeting


 

Purpose: To address concerns of the cancer committee (CC) and facility regarding the transition use of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer (DT) to the Veteran Symptom Assessment Screen (VSAS).

Background: The Cleveland VA Medical Center (CVAMC) had used the NCCN DT since 2012. In March 2016, in conjunction with the Durham VAMC, the CVAMC began to pilot the VSAS screening tool to replace the NCCN DT. This initiative was an attempt to use one tool that could be used across all VAs to satisfy both The American College of Surgeon’s (ACOS) Commission of Cancer (CoC) accreditation as well as the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) Certification. The CVAMC locally added social elements of transportation, housing and insurance to the VSAS tool.

Methods: In March 2016 the Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) clinic continued to use the NCCN DT while the Oncology Clinics (OC) began to initiate the VSAS. In the CVAMC OC, Veterans that scored a 4 or greater on the VSAS tool in depression, anxiety, or distress or answered yes to transportation, housing, or insurance concerns had a Distress Screening Outpatient Consult entered into CPRS by the intake RN/LPN in clinic. The consultation was then signed off by the provider in clinic delivering care to Veteran that day. The consult was received, reviewed and completed by the oncology social worker (OSW) or the oncology behavioral health (OBH).

Results: In 2016 there were 162 NCCN DT distress screenings that were completed. 38% scored a 4 or above and required referral to OBH/OSW. Only 53% had complete documentation in CPRS. In contrast the VSAS in 2016 had 107 screenings that were completed. 31% required referral to OBH/OSW. 97% had complete documentation in CPRS.

Conclusions/Implications: This pilot project at the CVAMC allowed clear comparison between NCCN DT and VSAS tools. At our institution, the completion rate of the VSAS, referral and documentation process clearly was more effective than the NCCN DT process. Due to these outcomes the CC and facility made the decision to transition our distress screening process to the VSAS from the NCCN DT.

Recommended Reading

Secondary Cancers After Prostate Cancer: What’s the Risk?
AVAHO
Less lenalidomide may be more in frail elderly multiple myeloma patients
AVAHO
Characterization of Hematology Consults for Complete Blood Count Abnormalities: A Single Center Experience in the Era of Electronic Consultation
AVAHO
Recurrent Cisplatin Hypersensitivity Reaction After First Exposure: A Case Report
AVAHO
Failure Patterns After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Their Implications for Future Management
AVAHO
Comparison of PFT Before and After Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer
AVAHO
Using Natural Language Processing in Radiology Reports to Identify the Presence of Metastatic Disease in Veterans With Prostate Cancer
AVAHO
Examining Methods for Systematically Identifying Cytogenetic Testing Among Chronic Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients
AVAHO
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Chemoprevention Use Among VA Primary Care
AVAHO
Electronic Consultation: An Efficient and Effective Way to Manage Hematology Consults
AVAHO