Conference Coverage

Oral Chemotherapy Monitoring at the W.G. Hefner VA Medical Center: A Quality Practice Initiative (QOPI)- Based Program

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Background: The use of oral chemotherapy, both as monotherapy and in combination with parenteral chemotherapy, has drastically increased. Goals of oral chemotherapy monitoring include initial patient education, assessment of adherence during therapy, ensuring baseline and routine lab monitoring, and testing. The provision of cost savings is performed when possible. To achieve these goals, a QI initiative was implemented to determine the feasibility of a multi-disciplinary oral chemotherapy monitoring program within a VA oncology clinic.

Methods: The QI initiative was started in February 2019. To facilitate and standardize communication between Oncology providers, Oncology Nursing staff and the Oncology Clinical Pharmacist (CPS), an “Oncology Chemotherapy Consult” was created. Entry of the consult in CPRS by the Oncology Provider alerts Oncology Nursing and Oncology Pharmacy staff to a new patient starting oral chemotherapy. The Oncology CPS receives and reviews the consult and verifies that a pharmacy Prior Authorization Drug Request Consult (PADR) has been entered, if applicable. All available labs are reviewed, and any additional baseline labs or testing are requested by the CPS. The Oncology RN designated for chemotherapy education provides face-to-face education for the medication(s) on the same day of the provider visit and determines the date of the return appointment for a toxicity screen approximately 14 days later. Once the PADR is reviewed and approved, the CPS completes the consult and orders a split-fill (15-day supply) of medication.

Results: The QI initiative to improve oral chemotherapy delivery and monitoring was proven effective and feasible. 95% of new oral chemotherapy patients have been enrolled in this program since its inception. Cost savings analysis is in progress and data will be available prior to the AVAHO meeting. Interventions performed to improve adherence and education will also be available

Conclusion: Based on results since initiation of this quality practice initiative, improved treatment adherence has been observed, early identification and management of toxicity has occurred, and utilization of a split-fill strategy for initial dosing has resulted in cost savings. Even in the early phase of this initiative, feasibility has been identified and increased benefit is predicted.

Recommended Reading

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Urothelial Cancer: An Update on New Therapies (FULL)
AVAHO
Nivolumab-Induced Hypothyoidism With Consequent Hypothyroid Related Myopathy
AVAHO
How Long Should it Take to Get a Pathology Diagnosis?
AVAHO
Surgical Margins and Other Important Prognostic Factors in Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Survival
AVAHO
Development of VET-ROC, the Veterans Radiation Oncology Consortium to Support and Promote VA Clinical Research
AVAHO
Combination Immunotherapy Leading to Severe Hepatotoxicity and Fatal Aplastic Anemia: Case Report and Review of the Literature
AVAHO
Unusual Case of Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastasis To Duodenum Presenting as Gastrointestinal Bleeding
AVAHO
How Detection and Prevention of Gynecologic Carcinomas at One Major Veteran Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) is Superior to the Private Sector: A Review of Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Grade 3 (CIN III) and Invasive Carcinomas from 2008
AVAHO
The Incidence of Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) at a VA Emergency Department (ED) in Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICPIs)
AVAHO
Effect of Health Literacy Education on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting
AVAHO