News

Obinutuzumab trends better than rituxumab in relapsed indolent lymphoma


 

FROM JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma who were treated with obinutuzumab experienced higher response rates than did patients given rituximab with an acceptable safety profile, according to new findings.

However, the difference did not translate into an improvement in progression-free survival, so the clinical value of obinutuzumab in this patient population is still unclear.

The quality of remissions was better with obinutuzumab, with an almost twofold higher complete response/unconfirmed complete response rate (41.9% vs. 22.7%; P = .006),” wrote Dr. Laurie Sehn from the Centre for Lymphoid Cancer, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and her colleagues (J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 17. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.59.2139).

On the basis of an independent review, the best overall response was better in the obinutuzumab arm (P = .04), but the complete response/unconfirmed response rate was not different for the two groups.

The study was published online Aug. 17 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

A total of 175 patients with relapsed CD20+ indolent lymphoma were randomized 1:1 to four once-per-week infusions of either obinutuzumab (1,000 mg) or rituximab (375 mg/m2). Those without any evidence of disease progression after completing induction therapy received obinutuzumab or rituximab maintenance therapy every 2 months for up to 2 years.

At the end of induction, the investigator assessed overall response rate was 44.6% in the obinutuzumab arm and 33.3% in the rituximab arm (P = .08); nine patients receiving obinutuzumab (12.2%) and four given rituximab (5.3%) achieved complete response or unconfirmed complete response, but the difference was not significant (P = .07).

Independent review also found the overall response rate to be higher with obinutuzumab vs. rituximab (44.6% vs. 26.7%; P = .01), but with no difference in complete response/unconfirmed complete response rate (5.4 vs. 4.0; P = .34).

Adverse events were similar in each group, and most episodes were grade 1 to 2. Higher rates of infusion-related reactions (74% vs. 51%) and cough (24% vs. 9%) were observed in the obinutuzumab vs. the rituximab arm.

Dr. Sehn receives research funding and honoraria from, and serves in a consulting or advisory role to, Roche/Genentech, the maker of obinutuzumab (Gyzyva) and rituximab (Rituxan). She also receives honoraria from and serves in a consulting or advisory role to Amgen, Janssen, Seattle Genetics, Lundbeck, and Celgene.

Recommended Reading

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the lung in a 63-year-old man with left flank pain
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Ibrutinib highly active against refractory Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
VIDEO: Rituximab-refractory indolent NHL yields to combo treatment
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Early relapse signals high mortality in follicular lymphoma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Second pathology review boosts diagnostic accuracy in lymphoma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Interim PET provides limited prognostic value for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Interim PET results guide ongoing therapy in Hodgkin lymphoma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Doxorubicin, radiation doses predict heart risk in lymphoma survivors
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Treatment of choice for NLPHL? Involved-field RT alone
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Lenalidomide + rituximab combo effective in recurrent follicular lymphoma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology