Practice Economics

Small businesses snub Obamacare’s SHOP exchange


 

References

After nearly 2 years in operation and millions of dollars spent in development, the small business health insurance exchange created by the Affordable Care Act is struggling to catch on.

Nationally, about 85,000 people, from 11,000 small businesses, have coverage through the online marketplace known as the Small Business Health Options Program, or SHOP, according to the latest federal data released in May. Those totals do not include employers that began coverage in 2014 and have not yet renewed their coverage through HealthCare.gov for 2015.

That’s less than 1% of people with coverage in the U.S. small group insurance market that in 2013 had about 16.7 million people enrolled in health plans, reported Mark Farrah Associates, a market data firm.

Less than 1%% of people with coverage in the U.S. small group insurance market have enrolled in the SHOP exchange, according to the latest federal data. monkeybusinessimages/Thinkstock.com

Less than 1%% of people with coverage in the U.S. small group insurance market have enrolled in the SHOP exchange, according to the latest federal data.

The Congressional Budget Office in January estimated 1 million people would enroll for coverage through SHOP in 2015. No one expected the SHOP exchange to have a large enrollment, but industry officials say its early response has been substantially smaller than expected.

“When you look at the cost and look at the take up rate, it certainly raises questions” about whether SHOP has been worthwhile, said Alissa Fox, senior vice president of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association. “We never thought the business equation made sense.”

Employers with fewer than 50 full-time workers are eligible to buy coverage on SHOP. The federal government even offers businesses an incentive, a tax credit worth up to half of an employer’s share of their workers’ premiums. Among the conditions: The firm must employ fewer than 25 workers and their average salary cannot exceed $50,000. The credit is hardly used in high-cost areas of the country where salaries are higher.

Similar to the health insurance marketplace for individuals, the federal government operates the SHOP exchange in 34 states, and 16 other states plus the District of Columbia run their own small business exchanges. The state exchanges also capture a small share of the small business market, based on more current figures compiled by Kaiser Health News. As of early October, five state-run SHOP exchanges – Idaho, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, and Washington – had sold coverage to fewer than 200 employers. New York and California have the highest enrollments, and together those two states account for about 6,500 employers and nearly 50,000 people.

The Obama administration hoped SHOP would make it easier and cheaper for small employers to offer coverage to employees and for their workers to have a choice of plans.

Unlike the federal- and state-run health insurance exchanges for individuals that limit sign-up to a certain period during the year, the SHOP exchanges allow companies to enroll at any time.

But several factors account for the paltry enrollment in SHOP, say insurance brokers, insurers, and state officials. Brokers say SHOP has fewer health plans and more expensive coverage policies than can be purchased outside the exchange. Several states only have one insurer on their SHOP exchange, including Alabama, Tennessee, North Carolina and Nebraska, according to consulting firm Leavitt Partners.

Many small employers have stuck with plans they purchased outside SHOP because the Obama administration gave them the option to remain with their existing policies until 2017. That enabled employers to stay in plans that don’t meet all the new requirements of the health law, including so-called “essential health benefits.” These additional benefits can drive up the cost of policies, making it harder for the SHOP plans to compete.

Another factor that slowed enrollment in SHOP has been software problems in several states that made it hard for employers and employees to sign up. In addition, the SHOP exchange run by the federal government launched in October 2013 was only available if employers contacted an agent or broker. Its full website was not running until fall 2014.

“With all that stacked up against it, it does not surprise me that the numbers are so low,” said Kevin Lucia, a research professor at Georgetown University Health Policy Institute, who studied the rollout.

Kevin Counihan, the Obama administration’s top insurance exchange official, acknowledges SHOP will only be a “niche product” and most policies will still be sold outside the marketplace. Still, he expects as more employers and insurance brokers learn about SHOP, that its enrollment will grow. Asked in an interview about low enrollment, he said: “It doesn’t really bother me … something like this takes time.”

Mr. Counihan said the key will be to get more brokers interested in selling the SHOP plans.

Pages

Recommended Reading

California governor signs physician-assisted suicide bill into law
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Telemedicine poses novel legal risks for doctors
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Multistate compact could ease telemedicine licensing woes
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
CMS delays Stage 3 meaningful use until 2018, simplifies program
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
CMS seeks input to develop SGR replacement regulations
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Half of uninsured patients are eligible for Medicaid or ACA coverage
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Survey: Medicaid pay holds steady in states
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
HHS: Remaining uninsured worry about costs of coverage
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ACA insurance networks lack specialist coverage
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Healthcare.gov: Premiums to jump in 8 states
MDedge Hematology and Oncology