From the Editor

Balancing clinical and supportive care at every step of the disease continuum


 

It seems it was just yesterday that we did our first “mutation analysis” to help guide us in our treatment of patients with a drug that was more likely to work than not. Of course, I am referring to estrogen-receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) blocking therapy, and “yesterday” actually goes all the way back to the 1970s! When tamoxifen was first given to unselected metastatic breast cancer patients, the response rate was low, but when the study population was “enriched” with breast cancer patients who were ER/ PR-positive, the response rates improved and the outcomes were more favorable. So began the era of tumor markers and enriching patient populations, and the process now referred to as mutation analysis, which is becoming more broadly applicable to other tumors as well.

Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.

Recommended Reading

Everolimus makes splash in lung, GI neuroendocrine tumors
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Targeted therapy brings fresh hope for small-cell lung cancer treatment
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA expands use of nivolumab to non-squamous NSCLC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Surgery, dose-escalated chemoradiotherapy yield similar outcomes in NSCLC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Commentary: Red meat and cancer risk – what your patients should know
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Less pneumonitis with IMRT than 3D-CRT for non–small-cell lung cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Novel EGFR-TKI clears leptomeningeal disease in phase I study
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Experimental LOXO-101 induces regression in several hard-to-treat cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Osimertinib approved for NSCLC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Pan-AKT inhibitor shrinks tumors in patients with AKT1 mutation
MDedge Hematology and Oncology