From the Journals

Immunotherapy with less intense chemotherapy safe and effective for older patients with ALL

View on the News

Inotuzumab ozogamicin passes phase 2, on to phase 3

The efficacy and safety of inotuzumab ozogamicin reported by Hagop Kantarjian, MD, and his colleagues are an encouraging building block for older patents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, according to Carmelo Rizzari, MD.

“The authors have upgraded the valuable premises available from early inotuzumab ozogamicin studies into more concrete promises by rationally integrating the drug in a reduced-intensity chemotherapy regimen,” wrote Dr. Rizzari in an accompanying editorial published Lancet Oncology.

Adding inotuzumab ozogamicin to chemotherapy has shown efficacy and safety for both pediatric and adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia and therefore deserves more investigation in the “neglected” subgroup of older patients, according to Dr. Rizzari.

“Monoclonal antibodies represent, in the wider settings of immunotherapy, viable options to improve the results obtained in different subsets of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” wrote Dr. Rizzari.

Echoing the researchers, Dr. Rizzari mentioned the importance of the next step – a phase 3 trial comparing inotuzumab ozogamicin with the current standard of care – but also mentioned that a specific, widely recognized standard of care for this patient subgroup is difficult to pin down.

Dr. Rizzari is with the Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Unit of the University of Milano-Bicocca in Milan. These comments are based on an accompanying editorial published online in Lancet Oncology (2018 Jan 15. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045[18]30013-5 ). Dr. Rizzari declared no competing interests.


 

FROM LANCET ONCOLOGY

Inotuzumab ozogamicin appeared active and safe when added to reduced-intensity chemotherapy for older patients with Philadelphia chromosome–negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia, according to the results of a single-arm phase 2 study.

After a median follow-up of 29 months, 2-year progression-free survival was 59% with a median of 25 months for 52 patients with newly diagnosed disease who were aged 60 years or older, Hagop Kantarjian, MD, and his associates reported online in the Lancet Oncology.

Nearly every patient experienced an overall response (98%). The treatment also appeared to be safe, Dr. Kantarjian and associates wrote.

They reported that no patient died within 4 weeks of treatment and that four patients experienced veno-occlusive disease. Common grade 3 or 4 side effects included thrombocytopenia (81%), consolidation chemotherapy (69%), hyperglycemia (54%), infections during induction (52%), hypokalemia (31%), increased aminotransferases (19%), hyperbilirubinemia (17%), and hemorrhage (15%). Six patients died from treatment-related side effects, five of whom died from sepsis and one of whom died as a result of veno-occlusive disease.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin is an anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody that is bound to the toxin calicheamicin. It has shown “substantial improvements” for some patient subgroups when added to hyper-CVAD chemotherapy (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with methotrexate and high-dose cytarabine); however, older patients have yet to experience a similar benefit, Dr. Kantarjian and his associates said.

Both CVAD and inotuzumab ozogamicin have shown to be quite toxic for older patients. So – in order limit increased toxicity – Dr. Kantarjian and his associates lowered the intensity of hyper-CVAD. They accomplished this by reducing some aspects of the regimen by up to 50% and eliminating anthracyclines altogether. The researchers referred to this regimen as “mini–hyper-CVD.” The mini–hyper-CVD did not appear to impact activity.

“In our study, activity did not appear to be compromised by the use of lower-intensity chemotherapy in combination with a novel monoclonal antibody,” they wrote.

Dr. Kantarjian and his associates noted that, while they observed fewer deaths compared with previously published data, the number of deaths they did observe in patients who achieved a complete response was high.

They suggested that modifications to the regimen could further improve safety and that such modifications required further research.

For the time being, however, the researchers noted that this low-intensity regimen, in combination in inotuzumab ozogamicin, is highly effective and that these data now require prospective confirmation in a randomized, phase 3 setting.

The study was funded by the MD Anderson Cancer Center. Researchers reported that Pfizer provided inotuzumab ozogamicin free of charge and that Dr. Kantarjian and two other researchers received grants from Pfizer.

Recommended Reading

Flu vaccine did not protect children with acute leukemia
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Children with pathogenic TP53 variants face increased risk of hard-to-treat ALL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
CAR T-cell therapy on fast track in US, EU
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Survival differences among AYAs with blood cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Gene variants associated with high-risk pediatric ALL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Combo produces responses in R/R Ph+ ALL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Combo shows promise for elderly/unfit ALL patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
EC approves new formulation of pegaspargase
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
System helps predict RFS, OS in BCP-ALL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Antimalarial could aid treatment of ALL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology