Case-Based Review

Management of Late Pulmonary Complications After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation


 

References

The 2005 National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic GVHD developed a clinical strategy for diagnosing BOS using the following criteria: absence of active infection, decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 75%, FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio of < 70%, and evidence of air trapping on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) or PFTs (residual volume > 120%). These diagnostic criteria were applied to a small series of patients with clinically identified bronchiolitis obliterans or biopsy-proven bronchiolitis obliterans. Only 18% of these patients met the requirements for the NIH consensus definition.5 A 2011 study that applied the NIH criteria found an overall prevalence of 5.5% among all transplant recipients but a prevalence of 14% in patients with GVHD.9 In 2014, the NIH consensus development group updated their recommendations. The new criteria for diagnosis of BOS require the presence of airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC < 70% or 5th percentile of predicted), FEV1 < 75% predicted with a ≥ 10% decline in fewer than 2 years, absence of infection, and presence of air trapping (by expiratory computed tomography [CT] scan or PFT with residual volume >120% predicted) (Table 2).

When there is another manifestation of chronic GVHD, only the first 3 criteria are necessary.10

Some issues must be considered when determining airflow obstruction. The 2005 NIH working group recommends using Crapo as the reference set,11 but the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III reference values are the preferred reference set at this time12 and should be used in the United States. A recent article showed that the NHANES values were superior to older reference sets (however, they did not use Crapo as the comparison), although this study used the lower limit of normal as compared with the fixed 70% ratio.13 The 2014 NIH consensus group does not recommend a specific reference set and recognizes an FEV1/FVC ratio of 70% or less than the lower limit of normal as the cutoff value for airflow obstruction.10

Another issue in PFT interpretation is the finding of a decrease in FEV1 and FVC and normal total lung capacity, which is termed a nonspecific pattern. This pattern has been reported to occur in 9% of all PFTs and usually is associated with obstructive lung disease or obesity.14 A 2013 study described the nonspecific pattern as a BOS subgroup occurring in up to 31% of bronchiolitis obliterans patients.15

  • What are the radiographic findings of BOS?

Chest radiograph is often normal in BOS. As discussed, air trapping can be documented using HRCT, according to the NIH clinical definition of bronchiolitis obliterans.16 A study that explored findings and trends seen on HRCT in HSCT patients with BOS found that the syndrome in these patients is characterized by central airway dilatation.17 Expiratory airway trapping on HRCT is the main finding, and this is best demonstrated on HRCT during inspiratory and expiratory phases.18 Other findings are bronchial wall thickening, parenchymal hypoattenuation, bronchiectasis, and centrilobular nodules.19

Galbán and colleagues developed a new technique called parametric response mapping that uses CT scanners to quantify normal parenchyma, functional small airway disease, emphysema, and parenchymal disease as relative lung volumes.20 This technique can detect airflow obstruction and small airway disease and was found to be a good method for detecting BOS after HSCT. In their study of parametric response mapping, the authors found that functional small airway disease affecting 28% or more of the total lung was highly indicative of bronchiolitis obliterans.20

  • What therapies are used to treat BOS?

Traditionally, BOS has been treated with systemic immunosuppression. The recommended treatment had been systemic steroids at approximately 1 mg/ kg. However, it is increasingly recognized that BOS responds poorly to systemic steroids, and systemic steroids may actually be harmful and associated with increased mortality.15,21 The chronic GVHD recommendations from 2005 recommend ancillary therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and pulmonary rehabilitation.11 The updated 2011 German consensus statement lays out a clear management strategy for mild and moderate-severe disease with monitoring recommendations.22 The 2014 NIH chronic GVHD working group recommends fluticasone, azithromycin, and montelukast (ie, the FAM protocol) for treating BOS.23 FAM therapy in BOS may help lower the systemic steroid dose.24,25 Montelukast is not considered a treatment mainstay for BOS after lung transplant, but there is a study showing possible benefit in chronic GVHD.26 An evaluation of the natural history of a cohort of BOS patients treated with FAM therapy showed a rapid decline of FEV1 in the 6 months prior to diagnosis and treatment of BOS and subsequent stabilization following diagnosis and treatment.27 The benefit of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids or the combination of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists has been demonstrated in small studies, which showed that these agents stabilized FEV1 and avoided the untoward side effects of systemic corticosteroids.28–30

Macrolide antibiotics have been explored as a treatment for BOS post HSCT because pilot studies suggested that azithromycin improved or stabilized FEV1 in patients with BOS after lung transplant or HSCT.31–33 Other studies of azithromycin have not shown benefit in the HSCT population after 3 months of therapy.34 A recent meta-analysis could neither support or refute the benefit of azithromycin for BOS after HSCT.35 In the lung transplant population, a study showed that patients who were started on azithromycin after transplant and continued on it 3 times a week had improved FEV1; these patients also had a reduced rate of BOS and improved overall and BOS-free survival 2 years after transplant.36 However, these benefits of azithromycin have not been observed in patients after HSCT. In fact, the ALLOZITHRO trial was stopped early because prophylactic azithromycin started at the time of the conditioning regimen with HSCT was associated with increased hematologic disease relapse, a decrease in airflow-decline-free survival, and reduced 2-year survival.30

Recommended Reading

Tagraxofusp produces high response rate in BPDCN
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Complementary medicine use common among patients on TKIs
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Idelalisib shows long-term safety, efficacy for relapsed CLL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Biomarker testing may transform treatment of acute GVHD
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA approves ivosidenib frontline for certain AML patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
More abnormal cells linked to poorer ASCT outcomes in MDS
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Combo proves most effective in HMA-naive, higher-risk MDS
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Researchers propose new risk groups for NK-AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Master trial seeks to aid drug development for pediatric AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA panel not ready to recommend quizartinib approval for FLT3-ITD+ AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology