Feature

Patient advocacy groups take in millions from drugmakers. Is there a payback?


 

Pharmaceutical companies gave at least $116 million to patient advocacy groups in a single year, reveals a new database logging 12,000 donations from large publicly traded drugmakers to such organizations.

Even as these patient groups grow in number and political influence, their funding and their relationships to drugmakers are little understood. Unlike payments to doctors and lobbying expenses, companies do not have to report payments to the groups.

The database, called “Pre$cription for Power,” shows that donations to patient advocacy groups tallied for 2015 – the most recent full year in which documents required by the Internal Revenue Service were available – dwarfed the total amount the companies spent on federal lobbying. The 14 companies that contributed $116 million to patient advocacy groups reported only about $63 million in lobbying activities that same year.

Though their primary missions are to focus attention on the needs of patients with a particular disease – such as arthritis, heart disease or various cancers – some groups effectively supplement the work lobbyists perform, providing patients to testify on Capitol Hill and organizing letter-writing and social media campaigns that are beneficial to pharmaceutical companies.

Six drugmakers, the data show, contributed a million dollars or more to individual groups that represent patients who rely on their drugs. The database identifies more than 1,200 patient groups. Of those, 594 accepted money from the drugmakers in the database.

The financial ties are troubling if they cause even one patient group to act in a way that’s “not fully representing the interest of its constituents,” said Matthew McCoy, a medical ethics professor at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, who coauthored a 2017 study about patient advocacy groups’ influence and transparency.

Notably, such groups have been silent or slow to complain about high or escalating prices, a prime concern of patients.

Pages

Recommended Reading

MDedge Daily News: How European data privacy rules may cost you
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Patients who hide. Patients who seek.
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
MDedge Daily News: How gastric bypass helps fight diabetes
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
MDedge Daily News: Does more marijuana mean fewer opioids?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Medicare Part D plans get more flexibility to make midyear changes
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Senators seek answers on Gleostine price hike
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
MDedge Daily News: Could gut bacteria trigger lupus?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Open enrollment 2018: Plan selections down slightly
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
MDedge Daily News: Antibiotic resistance leads to ‘nightmare’ bacteria
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Health IT ‘under-users’ outnumber ‘super-users’
MDedge Hematology and Oncology