From the Journals

Immediate postresection gemcitabine tops saline in low-grade non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer

View on the News

Findings merit practice change

The well designed and executed study “provides important results for patients and physicians alike,” Samuel D. Kaffenberger, MD, David C. Miller, MD, MPH, and Matthew E. Nielsen, MD, MS, wrote in an editorial accompanying the study report in JAMA.

Recurrent bladder cancer exacts major emotional, medical, and monetary costs, the experts stressed. “The natural history of frequent recurrences drives a uniquely intensive and costly program of invasive surveillance and treatment.”

Thus, while the trial results are promising, their “ultimate benefit” will depend on “more consistent and proficient use of intravesical gemcitabine than has been observed for mitomycin,” they said. Disseminating this “simple, safe, effective, and affordable” treatment will require education and mobilization of patients and physicians, advocacy organizations, and health care system leaders.

Dr. Kaffenberger and Dr. Miller are at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and Dr. Nielsen is at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Dr. Nielsen disclosed stock options via the Grand Rounds Medical Advisory Board. Dr. Miller disclosed ties to Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. Dr. Kaffenberger reported having no conflicts of interest. These comments summarize their editorial (JAMA. 2018 319;18:1864-65).


 

FROM JAMA

For patients with suspected low-grade non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer, immediate postresection treatment with intravesicular gemcitabine significantly cut recurrence rates in a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

In the intention-to-treat analysis, estimated rates of 4-year recurrence were 35% with gemcitabine and 47% with placebo saline (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.90; P less than .001), reported Edward D. Messing of the University of Rochester, New York, and his associates. Gemcitabine also significantly outperformed placebo in the preplanned analysis of patients with confirmed low-grade non–muscle-invasive urothelial cancer (estimated 4-year recurrence rates , 4% and 54% respectively; HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.81; P = .001).

Intravesicular gemcitabine did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality or tumor progression to muscle invasion. “In an underpowered post hoc subgroup analysis, there [also] was no evidence of a benefit of immediate post-TURBT [transurethral resection of bladder tumor] gemcitabine in patients with high-grade non–muscle-invasive urothelial cancer,” the researchers wrote. The report was published May 8 in JAMA.

Robust data already support single-dose intravesicular chemotherapy with mitomycin C or epirubicin immediately after patients undergo TURBT. But in reality, this practice is uncommon in the United States. Meanwhile, systemic gemcitabine already is used to treat bladder cancer, and its intravesicular use appears safe and at least as effective as other chemotherapies, the investigators noted. Therefore, the SWOG S0337 trial enrolled 416 symptomatic patients with suspected low-grade papillary urothelial cancer who received a single intravesicular instillation of either gemcitabine (2 g in 100 mL saline) or saline (100 mL) within 3 hours after transurethral resection of TURBT.

Ten percent of patients did not receive study drug instillation, usually for medical reasons. There were no grade 4-5 adverse events. Grade 3 or lower adverse events did not significantly differ between groups. The study did not capture reliable data on tumor size or treatment at or after recurrence, the researchers said. Taken together, the findings “support using this therapy, but further research is needed to compare gemcitabine with other intravesical agents.”

The National Cancer Institute provided funding. Eli Lilly provided the gemcitabine used in the study. Dr. Messing reported having no relevant conflicts of interest. Three coinvestigators disclosed ties to BioCancell, Incyte, and various other biopharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Messing EM et al. JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1880-8.

Recommended Reading

Analgesic management in radiation oncology for painful bone metastases
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Protons linked to lower urinary AEs, higher costs than with IMRT for prostate cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
MRI matches standard biopsy at detecting significant prostate cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Tivozanib after sorafenib promising in patients with advanced RCC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Diabetes from checkpoint inhibitors probably means lifelong insulin
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA approves immunotherapy combo for advanced RCC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
New regimen looks good in stage IV favorable histology Wilms
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Company discontinues phase 3 ADAPT for mRCC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
World Trade Center responders face greater cancer burden, including greater risk of multiple myeloma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Rare paraneoplastic dermatomyositis secondary to high-grade bladder cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology