From the Journals

Is cancer immunotherapy more effective in men than women?

View on the News

Sex differences in cancer immunotherapy outcomes unclear

While cancer immunotherapy represents one of the most significant clinical advances in cancer treatment in the past decade, the basic but important clinical question about different effects between men and woman has not been addressed until now. The authors of this study are to be congratulated on such a comprehensive and well-conducted analysis, but the data does not completely support their final conclusion that checkpoint inhibitors benefit men more than women.

There are a large number of baseline characteristics of solid tumors that might differ between men and women and that have also been reported to impact the outcomes of patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors. Some of these may be lifestyle or behavioral characteristics – such as different smoking habits between men and women with non–small cell lung cancer – or differences in the distribution of oncogenic driver mutations between men and women.

We should therefore be cautious in jumping to conclusions and changing the current standard of care with respect to checkpoint inhibitors. In particular, we should not be denying treatment to women who are otherwise indicated for checkpoint inhibitors, based on these findings.

Omar Abdel-Rahman, MD, is from the clinical oncology department of the faculty of medicine at Ain Shams University in Cairo and from the Tom Baker Cancer Centre in Calgary. These comments are taken from an accompanying editorial (Lancet Oncol. 2018 May 16. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045[18]30270-5.) No conflicts of interest were declared.


 

FROM LANCET ONCOLOGY


Despite this, sex is rarely taken into account when new therapeutic approaches are tested, the authors said.

They also commented on the fact that there was a relatively low number of women included in each trial, an issue that was recognized as far back as the 1990s as a major problem in medical trials.

“Our results further highlight this problem, showing clinically relevant differences in the efficacy of two important classes of immunological drugs, namely anti–CTLA-4 and anti–PD-1 antibodies, when compared with controls in male and female patients with advanced solid tumors,” they wrote.

They noted that they couldn’t exclude the possibility that the effect may be the result of other variables that were distributed differently between the sexes. However, they also qualified this by saying that variables known to affect the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as PD-L1 expression and mutation status, were not likely to explain the results.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Chemotherapy, metabolic pathway may affect CAR T-cell potential
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
HDAC inhibition may boost immune therapy efficacy in breast cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Checkpoint inhibition less toxic than antiangiogenic therapy in NSCLC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Nivolumab helps some with advanced NSCLC reach 5-year mark
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Surgery after immunotherapy effective in advanced melanoma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Blinatumomab triggers complete MRD response in ALL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
KEYNOTE-054: Adjuvant pembrolizumab beat placebo in high-risk resected melanoma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Early results favorable for combo TLR9 agonist + pembro in advanced melanoma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
New drugs provide new options in HCC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Checkpoint inhibitors get to patients quickly
MDedge Hematology and Oncology