FDA/CDC

FDA offers guidance on MRD assessment in blood cancer trials


 

The Food and Drug Administration has issued draft guidance on the use of minimal residual disease assessment in clinical trials of patients with hematologic malignancies.

FDA icon Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License

The FDA said it developed the document to assist drug sponsors who are planning to use minimal residual disease (MRD) as a biomarker in clinical trials conducted under an investigational new drug application or to support FDA approval of products intended to treat hematologic malignancies.

“As a result of important workshops where we’ve heard from stakeholders and an analysis of marketing applications showing inconsistent quality of MRD data, the FDA identified a need to provide sponsors with guidance on the use of MRD as a biomarker in regulatory submissions,” FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, said in a statement.

The guidance explains how MRD might be used in clinical trials, highlights considerations for MRD assessment that are specific to certain hematologic malignancies, and lists requirements for regulatory submissions that utilize MRD.

MRD could potentially be used as a biomarker in clinical trials – specifically as a diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, efficacy-response, or monitoring biomarker, according to the draft guidance. Additionally, MRD could be used as a surrogate endpoint or “to select patients at high risk or to enrich the trial population.”

The draft guidance also provides specific considerations for MRD assessment in individual hematologic malignancies, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, acute promyelocytic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, and multiple myeloma.

The full document is available on the FDA website.

Recommended Reading

Early supportive care cuts costs and admissions in cancer patients undergoing curative treatment
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
The patient who doesn’t like you
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Employer health insurance: Deductibles rising faster than wages
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
MBC care causes more money problems for uninsured – but more financial stress for the insured
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Telehealth: States broaden options for locations, providers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Bias in the clinical setting can impact patient care
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Tech-based cancer company raises access concerns
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Feds say ACA’s silver plan premiums will drop in 2019
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
MedPAC eyes ‘incident to’ billing
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Dr. Bawa-Garba and trainee liability
MDedge Hematology and Oncology