News

FDA approves IV formulation of aprepitant for CINV


 

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Cancer patient receiving chemotherapy

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved use of an intravenous (IV) formulation of aprepitant (CINVANTI™) to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

CINVANTI is intended to be used in combination with other antiemetic agents to prevent acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC).

CINVANTI is to be used in combination with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone.

The full prescribing information is available at www.cinvanti.com.

The US commercial launch of CINVANTI is planned for January 2018.

CINVANTI is the first IV formulation to directly deliver aprepitant, a substance P/neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist.

Aprepitant is also the active ingredient in EMEND® capsules, which were approved by the FDA in 2003. EMEND IV®, which was approved in 2008, contains aprepitant’s prodrug, fosaprepitant.

Heron Therapeutics, Inc., developed CINVANTI in an attempt to provide an IV formulation of aprepitant that has the same efficacy as IV fosaprepitant but does not pose the risk of adverse events (AEs) related to polysorbate 80.

“Aprepitant has long been the standard in the NK1 class, and it remains the only single-agent NK1 with proven efficacy in preventing CINV in both the acute and delayed phases in HEC and MEC,” said Rudolph M. Navari, MD, PhD, of the University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine.

“Because CINVANTI is a novel, polysorbate 80-free, IV formulation of aprepitant, it enables physicians to provide patients with standard-of-care efficacy without the potential risk of polysorbate 80-related adverse events, such as infusion-site reactions.”

The FDA approved CINVANTI based on data demonstrating the bioequivalence of CINVANTI to EMEND IV.

A phase 1, randomized, 2-way cross-over study comparing the drugs enrolled 100 healthy subjects. The subjects received CINVANTI at 130 mg or EMEND IV at 150 mg, given over 30 minutes on day 1 of periods 1 and 2.

The researchers said 90% confidence intervals for CINVANTI AUC0-t (area under the time-concentration curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration), AUC0-inf (area under the time-concentration curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity), and C12h (plasma concentration at 12 hours) “were well within bioequivalence bounds,” which was 80% to 125%.

The team also found the incidence of treatment-emergent AEs was lower with CINVANTI than EMEND IV—21% and 28%, respectively. The same was true for related treatment-emergent AEs—15% and 28%, respectively.

These data were presented at the Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association Annual Conference in March/April and the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC)/International Society of Oral Oncology (ISOO) Annual Meeting in June.

Recommended Reading

Adequately nourished AML patients have survival advantage
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA approves first Erdheim-Chester disease treatment
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
AML candidate drug back in the pipeline
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
EMA grants accelerated assessment to drug for AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA lifts hold on trials of universal CAR T-cell therapy
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Intervention improves well-being in AYAs with cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Ibrutinib sustains efficacy in CLL at 4-year follow-up
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Cancer drug costs increasing despite competition
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Cancer patients prefer computer-free interactions
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Study reveals misperceptions among AML patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology