A new study suggests that having sickle cell disease (SCD) should not prevent patients from receiving tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) to treat ischemic stroke if they otherwise qualify for the treatment.
Researchers compared outcomes of tPA treatment in stroke patients with and without SCD and found no significant differences between the groups with regard to serious complications, length of hospital stay, or in-hospital mortality.
“Having sickle cell disease did not adversely affect any of the indicators we measured,” said Robert J. Adams, MD, of the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston.
The SCD patients did have a higher rate of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) than patients without SCD, although the rate was not significantly higher. Still, the researchers said further study is needed to look more closely at this outcome.
Dr Adams and his colleagues reported their findings in the journal Stroke.
The team noted that use of tPA has never been contraindicated in SCD, but guidelines recommend acute exchange transfusion for stroke in SCD, rather than tPA.
To gain more insight into the effects of tPA in patients with SCD, the researchers analyzed in-hospital data compiled by the quality improvement program Get With The Guidelines – Stroke.
The data included 2,016,652 stroke patients seen at 1952 participating US hospitals between January 2008 and March 2015. From these patients, the researchers identified 832 with SCD and 3328 age-, sex-, and race-matched controls.
There was no significant difference between the 2 cohorts in the rate of tPA use—8.2% for SCD patients and 9.4% for controls (P=0.3024).
Likewise, there was no significant difference in the timeliness of tPA administration. The median door-to-needle time was 73 minutes for SCD patients and 79 minutes for controls (P=0.3891).
Among patients who received tPA, there was no significant difference in the overall rate of serious complications, which occurred in 6.6% of the SCD patients and 6.0% of controls (P=0.7732).
Serious complications included symptomatic ICH, which occurred in 4.9% of the SCD patients and 3.2% of controls who received tPA (P= 0.4502).
Although this difference was not significant, the researchers said additional studies are needed to track the ICH rate in SCD patients receiving tPA.
The researchers also calculated the odds ratios (ORs) for various outcomes in tPA-treated SCD patients compared to controls.
In an analysis adjusted for multiple covariates, the OR for in-hospital mortality was 1.21 for SCD patients (P=0.4150), the OR for being discharged home was 0.90 (P=0.2686), and the OR for having a hospital stay lasting beyond 4 days was 1.15 (P=0.1151).
“People with sickle cell disease and an acute stroke who would otherwise qualify for tPA did not have worse outcomes than stroke patients who did not have sickle cell disease,” Dr Adams noted.
He and his colleagues said these findings suggest tPA is safe for patients with SCD and could potentially be used as a complementary therapy to red blood cell exchange, the current guideline-recommended frontline therapy for ischemic stroke in patients with SCD.
“These findings suggest that a future randomized trial that compares using red blood cell exchange alone versus combination therapy with tPA and red blood cell exchange should be undertaken to evaluate the outcomes of [ischemic stroke] in patients with sickle cell disease,” said study author Julie Kanter, MD, of the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston.