News

Making K-Ras cancers druggable


 

Drug release in a cancer cell

Credit: PNAS

New findings suggest drugs can effectively fight K-Ras-mutant cancers—if they have a little help.

Experiments in human cancer cells showed that K-Ras-mutant tumor growth was highly dependent on the cells’ constant need to check and mend their DNA.

However, inhibiting the activity of H-Ras and N-Ras prevented the DNA damage response. And this made the cells more vulnerable to treatment.

“Our finding suggests that K-Ras cancers can be made more susceptible to existing therapies by interfering with their DNA repair mechanisms,” said Dafna Bar-Sagi, PhD, of the New York University School of Medicine.

“What some researchers have described as therapeutic ‘mission impossible’ may now become a ‘mission doable.’”

Dr Bar-Sagi and her colleagues reported this discovery in Cancer Cell.

The group’s research began with experiments to determine how Ras signaling leads to the uncontrolled growth of cancer cells. The team found that downregulation of wild-type H-Ras and N-Ras in mutant K-Ras cells caused the buildup of damaged DNA and slowed cell growth.

In the absence of H-Ras and N-Ras, K-Ras-mutant cancer cells failed to repair their DNA at the G2 phase of cell division. And this defect was caused by failure to properly activate Chk1.

With this in mind, the researchers decided to test the effects of H-Ras or N-Ras knockdown on treatment with DNA-damaging agents.

Knockdown of H-Ras or N-Ras sensitized K-Ras-mutant cancer cells to SN38 and oxaliplatin in vitro. But the same effect did not occur when H-Ras or N-Ras was knocked down in K-Ras-wild-type cancer cells.

K-Ras-mutant cancer cells were also sensitive to treatment with the Chk1/Chk2 inhibitor AZD7726 when H-Ras or N-Ras was knocked down in vitro.

To further support these findings, the researchers conducted experiments in mice with K-Ras-mutant tumors. Mice with H-Ras knockdown experienced tumor growth similar to controls.

But when the mice with H-Ras-suppressed tumors received the chemotherapy drug irinotecan, they experienced tumor regression that lasted up to 18 days post-treatment. On the other hand, mice without H-Ras suppression experienced modest tumor growth after treatment with irinotecan.

“Discovering more about how these different forms of Ras act on one another—including how they control DNA damage repair at Chk1 in combination with chemotherapy—could help us design drugs that greatly stall disease progression,” said study author Elda Grabocka, PhD, also of the New York University School of Medicine.

The researchers are now planning additional experiments on the biological interdependency of Ras proteins and what other chemotherapies might be involved in slowing cancer growth. Their goal is to map the Ras signaling pathways and identify as many therapeutic targets as possible.

Recommended Reading

FDA expands ibrutinib approval to include chronic lymphocytic leukemia
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Mutant HSCs appear to drive AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
New insight into megakaryocytic leukemias
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Normal enzyme aids mutated FLT3 to fuel AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Improving the efficacy of etoposide
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Sequencing reveals therapeutic target for leukemias
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Combo may overcome drug resistance in ALL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Affluence seems to affect CML survival in the UK
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Power lines don’t raise leukemia risk in kids
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA approves ibrutinib for previously treated CLL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology