News

CHMP recommends approval of topical gel for MF


 

Micrograph showing

mycosis fungoides

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended that chlormethine gel (Ledaga®) be approved for use in adults with mycosis fungoides (MF).

Ledaga is a hybrid medicine of Caryolysine, which has been approved for use in the European Union since 1946.

Ledaga contains the same active substance as Caryolysine but is a gel intended for cutaneous use.

The active substance of Ledaga is chlormethine, a bifunctional alkylating agent that inhibits rapidly proliferating cells.

Hybrid drug applications rely, in part, on the results of preclinical tests and clinical trials for a reference product and, in part, on new data.

The CHMP said studies have demonstrated the satisfactory quality of Ledaga. Since Ledaga is administered as a topical agent and results in no systemic exposure, a bioequivalence study versus the reference product, Caryolysine, was not required.

The CHMP’s recommendation for Ledaga will be reviewed by the European Commission, which is expected to issue a final decision by the end of February 2017.

If approved, Ledaga will be available as a 160 μg/g gel.

Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, the company developing Ledaga, has agreed to a list of recommendations from the CHMP (post-authorization measures) with regard to the release of Ledaga in Europe.

Subject to the agreed recommendations and achieving market access in different countries, a potential first launch of Ledaga could occur at the end of 2017, at the earliest.

Phase 2 study

The CHMP’s positive opinion of Ledaga is based on results of a multicenter, randomized, observer-blinded, active-controlled study of patients with stage I and IIA MF. Results from this phase 2 study were published in JAMA Dermatology.

The study enrolled 260 patients who were randomized 1:1 to receive topical treatment with Ledaga or compounded control—chlormethine HCl 0.02% compounded in Aquaphor® ointment—once daily for up to 12 months.

A response was defined as at least a 50% improvement in the baseline Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity score.

In the intent-to-treat population, 59% (76/130) of patients who received Ledaga achieved a clinical response, compared to 48% (62/130) of patients treated with the compounded control. The rate of complete response was 14% (n=18) and 12% (n=15), respectively.

Patients who were treated for at least 6 months were included in the efficacy-evaluable population. In this population, 77% (69/90) of patients who received Ledaga achieved a clinical response, compared to 59% (56/95) of patients treated with the compounded control. The rate of complete response was 19% (n=17) and 15% (n=14), respectively.

Reductions in mean lesion severity were seen as early as 4 weeks into the study, with further reductions observed with continuing therapy. The time to first confirmed response favored Ledaga.

The most frequent adverse reactions reported with Ledaga were skin-related—dermatitis (55%; eg, skin irritation, erythema, rash, urticaria, skin-burning sensation, pain of the skin), pruritus (20%), skin infections (12%), skin ulceration and blistering (6%), and skin hyperpigmentation (6%).

No systemic absorption of chlormethine was detected with treatment.

Recommended Reading

Study reinforces lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Autologous stem cell transplantation beat bortezomib regimen in myeloma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Characterizing FL transformation, progression
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
EC authorizes new use for ofatumumab in CLL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
EC grants venetoclax conditional approval for CLL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
CAR met primary endpoint at interim analysis in DLBCL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Predicting therapy-related myeloid neoplasms
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Data suggest one BTK inhibitor could replace another
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Group estimates global cancer cases, deaths in 2015
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Drug produces responses in ‘challenging’ patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology