News

Survey reveals need to evaluate EOL discussions


 

Doctor and cancer patient

Photo courtesy of the

National Cancer Institute

and Mathews Media Group

End-of-life (EOL) discussions often occur “too late” for patients with hematologic malignancies, according to a survey of US hematologists.

The researchers who conducted the survey speculate that physicians may delay EOL discussions with these patients because, unlike most solid tumors,

which are incurable when they reach an advanced stage, many advanced hematologic malignancies remain curable.

So it may not be clear that a patient has entered the EOL phase.

Oreofe O. Odejide, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, Massachusetts, and colleagues conducted the survey and reported the results in a letter to JAMA Internal Medicine.

The researchers mailed their survey on EOL discussions to US hematologists found in the clinical directory of the American Society of Hematology. The individuals surveyed provide direct care for adults with hematologic malignancies.

Three hundred and forty-nine hematologists completed the survey. Most were men (75.4%), and they had a median age of 52. More than half (55.4%) practiced in community centers, and 42.9% practiced primarily in tertiary centers.

Three hundred and forty-five individuals answered the question about typical timing of EOL discussions, and 55.9% said these discussions occur too late.

Hematologists practicing in tertiary centers were more likely to report late EOL discussions than those practicing in community centers—64.9% and 48.7%, respectively (P=0.003). This difference was still significant in multivariable analysis, with an odds ratio of 1.92 (P=0.004).

When it comes to specific aspects of EOL care, 42.5% of the hematologists reported conducting their first conversation about resuscitation status at less than optimal times; 23.2% reported waiting until death was clearly imminent before having an initial conversation about hospice care; and 39.9% reported waiting until death was clearly imminent before having an initial conversation about the preferred site of death.

The researchers said the lack of a clear distinction between the curative and EOL phases of hematologic malignancies may explain these findings. Additionally, physicians may hesitate to have EOL discussions because they don’t want to affect a patient’s mentality or because they themselves find it difficult to “give up” on patients who might still be cured.

Recommended Reading

Anti-BCL2, CD20 combo safe, effective in untreated CLL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Nilotinib safe, effective as first-line therapy for CML-CP patients age 65 and older
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
More complete cytogenetic responses at 12 months with radotinib than imatinib
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Chemo quadruples risk for myeloid cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
New agents effectively target CLL’s molecular Achilles
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
A potential target for IDH1-mutant cancers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Potential new alternative in CML when TKI therapy fails
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Osteoarticular pain affects CML patients stopping TKI
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
CAR T cells persist for 3 years in young ALL patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Venetoclax produces deep responses in ultra-high-risk CLL
MDedge Hematology and Oncology