Photo courtesy of NIH
Patients who make 3 or more trips to the general practitioner (GP) before they are referred for cancer tests are more likely to be dissatisfied with subsequent care, according to research published in the European Journal of Cancer Care.
Researchers analyzed survey responses from nearly 60,000 cancer patients and found that about 23% had visited their GP 3 or more times before they were referred for cancer tests.
These patients were more likely than patients with 1 or 2 GP visits to report negative experiences with regard to many different aspects of their care.
“This research shows that first impressions go a long way in determining how cancer patients view their experience of cancer treatment,” said study author Georgios Lyratzopoulos, MD, of University College London in the UK.
“A negative experience of diagnosis can trigger loss of confidence in their care throughout the cancer journey. When they occur, diagnostic delays are largely due to cancer symptoms being extremely hard to distinguish from other diseases, combined with a lack of accurate and easy-to-use tests. New diagnostic tools to help doctors decide which patients need referring are vital to improve the care experience for even more cancer patients.”
Dr Lyratzopoulos and his colleagues initially analyzed survey data from 73,462 cancer patients, but 15,355 of those patients (21%) had not seen a GP prior to their cancer diagnosis.
Of the 58,107 patients who had at least 1 primary care consultation, 44,827 (77%) had seen their GP once or twice before referral for cancer tests, and 13,280 (23%) had seen the GP 3 or more times.
The researchers analyzed patients’ responses to 12 survey questions that assessed satisfaction with various aspects of their cancer care.
And results showed that patients who had seen their GP 3 or more times before referral were significantly more likely than patients with 1 to 2 GP visits to report negative experiences across 10 of the 12 aspects of care.
The 12 aspects of care and patient responses (for 3+ GP visits and 1-2 visits, respectively) were as follows:
- Dissatisfied with overall care: 16% vs 9% (adjusted* odds ratio [aOR]=1.44, P<0.001)
- Dissatisfied with the way they were informed of their cancer: 22% vs 14% (aOR=1.38, P<0.001)
- Dissatisfied with their involvement in decision-making: 32% vs 25% (aOR=1.13, P<0.001)
- Lack of confidence/trust in their doctors: 19% vs 12% (aOR=1.22, P<0.001)
- Lack of confidence/trust in their nurses: 36% vs 27% (aOR=1.22, P<0.001)
- Thought doctors/nurses deliberately withheld information: 16% vs 10% (aOR=1.27, P<0.001)
- Dissatisfied with staff support: 41% vs 27% (aOR=1.68, P<0.001)
- Dissatisfied with integration of various caregivers (GP, hospital doctors/nurses, specialist nurses, etc): 45% vs 32% (aOR=1.48, P<0.001)
- Dissatisfied with the amount of time they had to wait at appointments with their hospital doctor: 31% vs 28% (aOR=1.10, P=0.007)
- Said their GP did not receive enough information about their condition or hospital treatment: 8% vs 5% (aOR=1.36, P<0.001)
- Said they did not receive clear written information about what they should or should not do after leaving the hospital: 20% vs 14% (aOR=1.06, P=0.100)
- Said they did not receive the name of a Clinical Nurse Specialist who would be in charge of their care: 11% vs 9% (aOR=1.00, P=0.894).
“This is the first time we’ve had direct feedback from patients on such a large scale to show how the timeliness of their diagnosis colors their experience of the care they later receive,” said Sara Hiom, of Cancer Research UK, which supported this study.
“It’s another good reason to highlight the importance of diagnosing cancer as quickly as possible, not just to give patients the best chances of survival, but also to improve their experience of the care they receive throughout their cancer journey.”
*The odds ratio was adjusted for patient age, sex, ethnicity, cancer diagnosis, and response tendency (likelihood of giving a positive or negative response to questions).